We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
META-ANALYSIS
Effects and safety of combination therapy with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue and growth hormone in girls with idiopathic central precocious puberty: a meta-analysis.
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation 2016 October
PURPOSE: This meta-analysis is to evaluate the effects and safety of the combination therapy for girls with idiopathic central precocious puberty (ICPP).
METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical controlled trials (CCTs) that adopted gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) therapy and GnRHa plus growth hormone (GH) combination therapy to treat ICPP girls.
RESULTS: A total of six RCTs (162 patients) and six CCTs (247 patients) were included. Compared to the GnRHa therapy group, the combination therapy group achieved taller final height (mean difference, MD = 2.81 cm, 95 % CI 1.76-3.87, four CCTs; MD = 4.30 cm, 95 % CI 0.59-8.01, one RCT); greater progression of final height compared with target height (MD = 3.92 cm, 95 % CI 3.12-4.73, four CCTs; MD = 4.00 cm, 95 % CI 1.93-6.07, One RCT) and larger height gains (MD = 3.49 cm, 95 % CI 0.97-6.01, four CCTs; MD = 3.88 cm, 95 % CI 0.15-7.61, one RCT). No severe adverse effects of treatment were reported.
CONCLUSION: For ICPP girls, the GnRHa and GH combination therapy had advantages over GnRHa alone on final height and no severe adverse effects were reported. We recommend comprehensive assessment of the individual growth rate, patient compliance, the clinical effects, the height expectations of individual patients and the treatment cost to the family in order to identify the best therapy for individual patients.
METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical controlled trials (CCTs) that adopted gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) therapy and GnRHa plus growth hormone (GH) combination therapy to treat ICPP girls.
RESULTS: A total of six RCTs (162 patients) and six CCTs (247 patients) were included. Compared to the GnRHa therapy group, the combination therapy group achieved taller final height (mean difference, MD = 2.81 cm, 95 % CI 1.76-3.87, four CCTs; MD = 4.30 cm, 95 % CI 0.59-8.01, one RCT); greater progression of final height compared with target height (MD = 3.92 cm, 95 % CI 3.12-4.73, four CCTs; MD = 4.00 cm, 95 % CI 1.93-6.07, One RCT) and larger height gains (MD = 3.49 cm, 95 % CI 0.97-6.01, four CCTs; MD = 3.88 cm, 95 % CI 0.15-7.61, one RCT). No severe adverse effects of treatment were reported.
CONCLUSION: For ICPP girls, the GnRHa and GH combination therapy had advantages over GnRHa alone on final height and no severe adverse effects were reported. We recommend comprehensive assessment of the individual growth rate, patient compliance, the clinical effects, the height expectations of individual patients and the treatment cost to the family in order to identify the best therapy for individual patients.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app