Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A modern era comparison of right versus left sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia outcomes.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: This study aims to retrospectively review outcomes, including neurodevelopmental outcomes, of neonatal right sided congenital diaphragmatic hernias (RCDH) compared with left sided congenital diaphragmatic hernias (L-CDH) treated surgically at our institute.

METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of all cases of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) treated at Princess Margaret Hospital for Children (PMH), Perth, born between 1st January 2002 and 1st August 2012. The outcomes of R-CDH cases were compared with L-CDH cases. We examined duration of ventilatory support, use of patch versus primary closure, the CDH recurrence rates, the number of reoperations and neurodevelopmental follow-up at one year of age.

RESULTS: Forty-nine cases of CDH were operated on at PMH during the 10-year period. Of these, ten cases were R-CDH with 39 L-CDH cases. Of 49 cases, 34 were diagnosed antenatally, 5 R-CDH versus 29 L-CDH. Only 8/39 cases of L-CDH required patch repair for larger defects, while 5/10 R-CDH required patch repair. Postoperative mortality was 6/49 (1/10 right sided versus 5/39 left sided). Recurrence was observed in 5/10 R-CDH versus 6/39 L-CDH with p=0.03. Thirty-three of 43 surviving patients received one-year follow-up with Griffiths general quotient (GQ) assessment demonstrating a median score of 98 for L-CDH (IQR 86 to 104.25) and 91 for R-CDH (IQR 76.5 to 93).

CONCLUSIONS: R-CDH required patch repair more commonly than L-CDH because of larger defect size or complete agenesis. The rate of recurrent herniation was the only morbidity significantly higher in the R-CDH group. Survivors of R-CDH did not have a significant difference in neurodevelopmental outcome compared to L-CDH cases, with both groups exhibiting normal median GQ scores at one year of age.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app