Assessment of inferior turbinate radiofrequency treatment: Monopolar versus bipolar.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the early results of monopolar (MP) and bipolar (BP) radiofrequency (RF) used in inferior turbinate hypertrophy treatment concerning aspects of patient and surgeon comfort.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized single-blind study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 71 patients with inferior turbinate hypertrophy resistant to medical treatment. BP RF was applied to 36 patients. MP RF was applied to 35 patients. Patients received no other treatment during their 6 months of follow-up examinations. They were evaluated by their symptoms (nasal obstruction severity, nasal obstruction frequency, postnasal drip, nasal crusting, hyposmia, patient satisfaction, and preoperative pain) with a visual analogue scale (VAS) done preoperatively on the 1st and 7th days and then in the 1st, 3rd, and 6th months postoperatively.

RESULTS: No significant difference was observed comparing the symptoms of patients after BP and MP inferior turbinate RF in long-term follow-up, whereas patients treated with MP RF showed early improvement in their symptoms on the 1st and 7th days postoperatively when compared to the BP group. The application time of MP RF was longer than that of the BP group. Pain during the operation was reported more frequently in the BP group.

CONCLUSION: MP and BP RF treatment showed no difference in long-term efficacy. However, MP RF therapy showed early improvement in symptoms and less pain in patients than in the BP RF group.