Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Time to positivity for detection of bacteremia in neonates.

The blood culture results of all samples obtained from newborns at Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Ga., during a 6-month period were analyzed to determine the time required for a blood culture to become positive, the time at which a culture could safely be considered negative, and the spectrum of isolated organisms. During the study period, 1,248 samples were submitted from all nurseries and processed by an automated detection instrument (BACTEC NR660). Of the 1,248 samples, 98 (7.8%) were positive by the end of a 7-day processing period; 29 of the 98 were classified as definite bacterial pathogens, 52 were classified as possible bacterial pathogens, 9 were classified as yeasts, and 8 were classified as contaminants. Virtually all organisms (28 of 29) categorized as definite pathogens were identified by day 2 of processing, and all were identified by day 4. All isolates of group B streptococcus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species, and Staphylococcus aureus were identified by day 2. Of all positive blood cultures, 79% were identified by day 2, 88% were identified by day 3, and 94% were identified by day 4. Of the 21 isolates identified after day 2, the only definite pathogen was from a sick baby in the intensive care unit. From among the 870 term low-risk newborns cultured because of maternal risk factors, only four possible pathogens were identified after day 2. The positive and negative predictive values of blood culture at days 2 and 4 were 92 and 99%, respectively. We conclude that, in our institution, (i) a 2-day processing period is sufficient to detect positive blood cultures in the asymptomatic term infant, (ii) a 4-day processing period will detect virtually all clinically important infections, and (iii) clinical yield from continuing blood culture processing beyond 4 days does not justify the time and cost involved.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app