JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Invasive fungal sinusitis in the pediatric population: Systematic review with quantitative synthesis of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal sinusitis (IFS) represents an often fatal condition within the pediatric population. In an effort to characterize demographics, treatment modalities, and prognostic factors, we performed a systematic review.

METHODS: We systematically reviewed EMBASE, Medline, TRIPdatabase, SCOPUS and the Cochrane database for invasive fungal nasal and sinus infections limited to individuals <18 years of age. Case series including 3 or more patients were included. Demographics, treatment and outcomes were analyzed using R Gui statistical software.

RESULTS: Twelve studies met inclusion criteria (103 patients). There was male preponderance of 48.5% with median age of 11 years old. Majority of patients had underlying leukemia (44.6%). Aspergillus was the predominant organism (47%). Isolated nasal findings occurred in 14% of patients and nasal findings occurred in 49% overall. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of immunocompromised patients was below 600 in most patients (99%). Average and median length of neutropenia was 2 weeks. All patients were prescribed amphoterocin with 50% as single medicinal therapy. Surgery occurred in 82.8% of cases. The mortality rate was 46%. Univariate analysis identified presenting with facial pain as a negative predictor of overall mortality (OR 0.296, 95% CI: 0.104-0.843, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Mortality remains high in pediatric patients with IFS. An ANC of <600 occurred in the majority of immunocompromised patients at a duration of 2 weeks. Presenting with facial pain was a negative predictor of mortality. Many studies label this condition as invasive fungal sinusitis; however, approximately one seventh presented with only nasal findings and half overall had nasal involvement.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app