We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Impact of cavotricuspid isthmus morphology in CRYO versus radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter.
Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal : SCJ 2017 April
OBJECTIVES: Cryoablation (CRYO) is an alternative to radiofrequency (RF) for catheter ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter (AFL). We aimed to study whether different CTI morphologies had different impacts on procedural success for CRYO and RF.
DESIGN: This study randomized 153 patients with CTI-dependent AFL (median age 65 years; range 34-82) to RF or CRYO (78 CRYO; 75 RF). Biplane angiography (RAO 30° and LAO 60°) was done before the ablation procedure and isthmuses were classified as straight (n = 81), concave (n = 43) or pouch-like (n = 29). RF was performed with a 3.5-mm open-irrigated tip catheter and CRYO was performed with a 9 F, 8-mm tip catheter. The ablation endpoint was bidirectional block of CTI.
RESULTS: Acute procedural success was achieved in 70/75 patients in the RF group and in 72/78 patients in the CRYO group. With regard to CRYO or RF, acute procedural success rates were similar between the three isthmus types: straight: CRYO (92%) and RF (96%); concave: CRYO (92%) and RF (94%); and pouch-like: CRYO (94%) and RF (85%). There were no significant differences regarding success rate between the different morphologies in the CRYO or the RF group. The CTI was longer in patients with acute failure compared to the patients with acute success (38 ± 7 mm versus 33 ± 6 mm, p = 0.045).
CONCLUSION: The CTI morphology did not influence the acute success rate for either the CRYO or the RF ablation of CTI-dependent AFL. A longer CTI was associated with a lower success rate regardless of energy source.
DESIGN: This study randomized 153 patients with CTI-dependent AFL (median age 65 years; range 34-82) to RF or CRYO (78 CRYO; 75 RF). Biplane angiography (RAO 30° and LAO 60°) was done before the ablation procedure and isthmuses were classified as straight (n = 81), concave (n = 43) or pouch-like (n = 29). RF was performed with a 3.5-mm open-irrigated tip catheter and CRYO was performed with a 9 F, 8-mm tip catheter. The ablation endpoint was bidirectional block of CTI.
RESULTS: Acute procedural success was achieved in 70/75 patients in the RF group and in 72/78 patients in the CRYO group. With regard to CRYO or RF, acute procedural success rates were similar between the three isthmus types: straight: CRYO (92%) and RF (96%); concave: CRYO (92%) and RF (94%); and pouch-like: CRYO (94%) and RF (85%). There were no significant differences regarding success rate between the different morphologies in the CRYO or the RF group. The CTI was longer in patients with acute failure compared to the patients with acute success (38 ± 7 mm versus 33 ± 6 mm, p = 0.045).
CONCLUSION: The CTI morphology did not influence the acute success rate for either the CRYO or the RF ablation of CTI-dependent AFL. A longer CTI was associated with a lower success rate regardless of energy source.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app