We have located links that may give you full text access.
An Inguinal Approach to Complex Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation.
Urology 2017 August
OBJECTIVE: To report our experience in applying the Lich-Gregoir extravesical ureteral reimplantation (EVR) approach to complex cases (megaureter, duplex systems) through a small inguinal incision, with the goal of minimizing invasiveness.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of all patients who underwent common sheath or tapered EVR through an inguinal incision. Patient characteristics and reflux grade were obtained, and outcomes were assessed. The technique involved a 2-cm incision made in the lowest inguinal skin crease, standard cord exposure and lateral retraction, and opening the floor of the canal to isolate the ureter. Excisional tapering was performed with the ureter dismembered from the bladder and then reimplanted via detrusorrhaphy, whereas common sheath reimplantation was performed with advancement fixation sutures and the ureters in situ.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (15 males and 13 females) with a median age of 1.7 years (range: 0.9-4.8 years) were included. Fifteen patients had ureteral tapering, 12 underwent common sheath reimplantation, and 1 child had both. Success was seen in 94% for tapering and 92% for common sheath reimplants, with a mean follow-up of 29.6 months. There were no postoperative obstructions, urinary leaks, or wound infections.
CONCLUSION: The inguinal approach can safely and effectively be applied to cases of extravesical ureteral tapering and common sheath reimplantation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of all patients who underwent common sheath or tapered EVR through an inguinal incision. Patient characteristics and reflux grade were obtained, and outcomes were assessed. The technique involved a 2-cm incision made in the lowest inguinal skin crease, standard cord exposure and lateral retraction, and opening the floor of the canal to isolate the ureter. Excisional tapering was performed with the ureter dismembered from the bladder and then reimplanted via detrusorrhaphy, whereas common sheath reimplantation was performed with advancement fixation sutures and the ureters in situ.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (15 males and 13 females) with a median age of 1.7 years (range: 0.9-4.8 years) were included. Fifteen patients had ureteral tapering, 12 underwent common sheath reimplantation, and 1 child had both. Success was seen in 94% for tapering and 92% for common sheath reimplants, with a mean follow-up of 29.6 months. There were no postoperative obstructions, urinary leaks, or wound infections.
CONCLUSION: The inguinal approach can safely and effectively be applied to cases of extravesical ureteral tapering and common sheath reimplantation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app