We have located links that may give you full text access.
Subtypes of primary angiitis of the CNS identified by MRI patterns reflect the size of affected vessels.
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2017 September
OBJECTIVE: To describe patterns of diagnostic findings, and identify subgroups of primary angiitis of the central nervous system (PACNS).
METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 31 patients with PACNS. Cases were selected by predetermined diagnostic criteria and stratified into biopsy-proven and imaging-based PACNS. We compared clinical characteristics, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings and imaging results including high-resolution vessel wall MRI between groups.
RESULTS: There were 31 cases of PACNS (mean age 45.6 years, 58.1% female), of whom 17 (55%) were biopsy-proven, 14 (45%) were based on imaging findings. Patients with a positive biopsy had fewer infarcts (29.4% vs 85.7%, p=0.003), were more likely to have meningeal and parenchymal contrast enhancement (76.5% vs 28.6%, p=0.012), were less likely to have abnormal MR angiography (11.8% vs 100%, p<0.001) and did not show vessel wall enhancement at the time of diagnosis (0% vs 76.9%, p<0.001). In contrast, patients with imaging-based diagnosis showed more frequently multiple infarcts and vessel abnormalities, with vessel wall enhancement in most of the cases. Clinical characteristics and CSF analysis did not reveal marked differences between groups.
INTERPRETATION: Multi-parametric MRI distinguishes two subtypes of PACNS that most likely differ concerning the affected vessel size. Biopsy-proven PACNS primarily involves smaller vessels beyond the resolution of vascular imaging, while imaging-based PACNS affects predominantly medium-sized vessels leading to false-negative biopsy results. Using distinct MRI patterns may be helpful for selecting patients for appropriate invasive diagnostic modalities.
METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 31 patients with PACNS. Cases were selected by predetermined diagnostic criteria and stratified into biopsy-proven and imaging-based PACNS. We compared clinical characteristics, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings and imaging results including high-resolution vessel wall MRI between groups.
RESULTS: There were 31 cases of PACNS (mean age 45.6 years, 58.1% female), of whom 17 (55%) were biopsy-proven, 14 (45%) were based on imaging findings. Patients with a positive biopsy had fewer infarcts (29.4% vs 85.7%, p=0.003), were more likely to have meningeal and parenchymal contrast enhancement (76.5% vs 28.6%, p=0.012), were less likely to have abnormal MR angiography (11.8% vs 100%, p<0.001) and did not show vessel wall enhancement at the time of diagnosis (0% vs 76.9%, p<0.001). In contrast, patients with imaging-based diagnosis showed more frequently multiple infarcts and vessel abnormalities, with vessel wall enhancement in most of the cases. Clinical characteristics and CSF analysis did not reveal marked differences between groups.
INTERPRETATION: Multi-parametric MRI distinguishes two subtypes of PACNS that most likely differ concerning the affected vessel size. Biopsy-proven PACNS primarily involves smaller vessels beyond the resolution of vascular imaging, while imaging-based PACNS affects predominantly medium-sized vessels leading to false-negative biopsy results. Using distinct MRI patterns may be helpful for selecting patients for appropriate invasive diagnostic modalities.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app