We have located links that may give you full text access.
Fertility-preserving surgery for advanced stage ovarian germ cell tumors.
Gynecologic Oncology 2017 December
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence and safety of uterine preservation among premenopausal women diagnosed with a malignant ovarian germ-cell tumor (MOGCT) of advanced stage (stage II-IV).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database was accessed and a cohort of women aged <40years, diagnosed with a MOGCT were identified. Those with stage II-IV disease who underwent cancer-directed surgery and received chemotherapy were selected for further analysis. Performance of hysterectomy was assessed from site-specific surgery codes. Overall survival (OS) was determined following generation of Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test. A Cox multivariate model was constructed to control for possible confounders.
RESULTS: A total of 526 eligible patients were identified; rate of hysterectomy was 20.2%. Women who had a hysterectomy were older (median age 30.5 vs 20years, p<0.001) and more likely to present with bilateral tumors (12.6% vs 3.8%, p<0.001). No differences were noted based on tumor histology (p=0.67). Rate of uterine preservation was 82.8%, 79.5% and 75% for those with stage II, III and IV disease respectively (p=0.46). There was no difference in OS between women who had hysterectomy and those who did not (p=0.051); five-year OS rates were 87.1% and 94.4% respectively. After controlling for disease stage, tumor histology and patient race, uterine preservation was not associated with a decreased survival (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.28, 1.24, p=0.19).
CONCLUSIONS: Uterine preservation was not associated with decreased survival and should be considered in women with advanced stage GCTs interested in future fertility.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database was accessed and a cohort of women aged <40years, diagnosed with a MOGCT were identified. Those with stage II-IV disease who underwent cancer-directed surgery and received chemotherapy were selected for further analysis. Performance of hysterectomy was assessed from site-specific surgery codes. Overall survival (OS) was determined following generation of Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test. A Cox multivariate model was constructed to control for possible confounders.
RESULTS: A total of 526 eligible patients were identified; rate of hysterectomy was 20.2%. Women who had a hysterectomy were older (median age 30.5 vs 20years, p<0.001) and more likely to present with bilateral tumors (12.6% vs 3.8%, p<0.001). No differences were noted based on tumor histology (p=0.67). Rate of uterine preservation was 82.8%, 79.5% and 75% for those with stage II, III and IV disease respectively (p=0.46). There was no difference in OS between women who had hysterectomy and those who did not (p=0.051); five-year OS rates were 87.1% and 94.4% respectively. After controlling for disease stage, tumor histology and patient race, uterine preservation was not associated with a decreased survival (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.28, 1.24, p=0.19).
CONCLUSIONS: Uterine preservation was not associated with decreased survival and should be considered in women with advanced stage GCTs interested in future fertility.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app