We have located links that may give you full text access.
The role of standard roentgenograms in the evaluation of instability of pelvic ring disruption.
Clinical Orthopaedics and related Research 1989 March
Anteroposterior pelvic roentgenograms of 154 patients with pelvic ring disruptions were evaluated to assess their value in the determination of pelvic instability. Three different categories of stability were roentgenographically recognizable: (1) stable, characterized by impacted vertical fracture of the sacrum, nondisplaced fracture of the posterior sacroiliac complex, and/or subtle fractures of the upper sacrum evidenced by asymmetry of the sacral arcuate lines; (2) unstable, characterized by hemipelvic cephalad displacement exceeding 0.5 cm, sacroiliac joint diastasis exceeding 1 cm and/or sacral or iliac diastatic fracture exceeding 0.5 cm; and (3) indeterminate (that is, suspicious but not diagnostic of pelvic instability), characterized by cephalad hemipelvic displacement of less than 0.5 cm, sacroiliac joint diastasis less than 1 cm, and/or diastatic fracture of the sacrum or ilium of less than 0.5 cm. Correlation of the standard roentgenographic, computed tomographic, and clinical orthopedic examinations revealed that pelvic stability was accurately evaluated on the standard pelvic roentgenograms in 88% of cases. Disruptions were stable in 70%, unstable in 18%, and suspect in 12% of patients, for whom adjunct roentgenographic and clinical examinations were required. Determination of pelvic stability in the manner described allows immediate identification of patients with a stable or unstable pelvic injury, as well as identification of those with indeterminate stability requiring further clinical or roentgenologic evaluation. Immediate recognition of pelvic instability on standard pelvic roentgenograms obviates the need for additional diagnostic studies that unnecessarily delay the institution of emergency therapeutic measures designed to control associated hemorrhage.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app