We have located links that may give you full text access.
Neonatal Macroglossia: Demographics, Cost of Care, and Associated Comorbidities.
Cleft Palate-craniofacial Journal 2018 September
OBJECTIVES: To examine the birth prevalence of congenital macroglossia and identify demographic variables and comorbidities that may influence length of stay and cost of care.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study using the Kids' Inpatient Database 2003, 2006, 2009, and 2012.
METHODS: Demographics were analyzed. Linear regression modeling and multivariate analyses were performed.
RESULTS: The birth prevalence of congenital macroglossia was 4.63/100 000 births. Patients were classified as isolated (n = 349, 48.1%) or syndromic (n = 377, 51.9%). A higher incidence of isolated macroglossia was seen in females (odds ratio, OR [95% confidence interval, 95% CI]: 1.93 [1.45-2.56] and African Americans (2.02 [1.41-2.88]). Length of stay was higher for syndromic patients than for nonsyndromic patients (22.6 days [18.6-26.6] vs 7.93 days [5.95-9.90], as were inpatient costs ($3619USD [$27 628-$44 754] vs $10 168USD [$6272-$14 064]. After accounting for gender, race, location, and socioeconomic status, the presence of macroglossia alone increased length of stay by 4.07 days (0.42-7.72 days) in nonsyndromic patients and 12.02 days (3.63-20.4 days) in syndromic patients. The cost of care increased by $6207USD ($576-$11 838) among nonsyndromic newborns and $17 205USD ($374-34 035) among syndromic patients.
CONCLUSION: The birth prevalence of congenital isolated macroglossia appears to vary by sex and race. Prolonged length of stay and increased costs are associated with both isolated macroglossia and syndromic macroglossia, even after controlling for other syndromic comorbidities.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study using the Kids' Inpatient Database 2003, 2006, 2009, and 2012.
METHODS: Demographics were analyzed. Linear regression modeling and multivariate analyses were performed.
RESULTS: The birth prevalence of congenital macroglossia was 4.63/100 000 births. Patients were classified as isolated (n = 349, 48.1%) or syndromic (n = 377, 51.9%). A higher incidence of isolated macroglossia was seen in females (odds ratio, OR [95% confidence interval, 95% CI]: 1.93 [1.45-2.56] and African Americans (2.02 [1.41-2.88]). Length of stay was higher for syndromic patients than for nonsyndromic patients (22.6 days [18.6-26.6] vs 7.93 days [5.95-9.90], as were inpatient costs ($3619USD [$27 628-$44 754] vs $10 168USD [$6272-$14 064]. After accounting for gender, race, location, and socioeconomic status, the presence of macroglossia alone increased length of stay by 4.07 days (0.42-7.72 days) in nonsyndromic patients and 12.02 days (3.63-20.4 days) in syndromic patients. The cost of care increased by $6207USD ($576-$11 838) among nonsyndromic newborns and $17 205USD ($374-34 035) among syndromic patients.
CONCLUSION: The birth prevalence of congenital isolated macroglossia appears to vary by sex and race. Prolonged length of stay and increased costs are associated with both isolated macroglossia and syndromic macroglossia, even after controlling for other syndromic comorbidities.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app