Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Survival outcome of tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) in the context of human papillomavirus (HPV): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to assess whether HPV-positive TSCC had better survival and prognosis rates, when compared to HPV-negative TSCC.

METHOD: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed comparing HPV status in TSCC patients. TSCC was confirmed with histopathology and HPV status was confirmed with PCR, immunohistochemistry and/or in-situ-hybridisation. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS).

RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were identified, involving 1921 TSCC cases, of which 56.2% (1079) were HPV positive. OS was significantly higher in patients with HPV-positive compared to HPV-negative TSCC in years 1-5 (OR 2.54, P < 0.01; OR 2.93 P < 0.01; OR 2.74 P < 0.01; OR 2.20 P < 0.01, and OR 2.14 P < 0.01 respectively). Similarly, DFS was also significantly higher in patients with HPV-positive compared to HPV-negative TSCC in years 1-3 (OR 2.86, P < 0.01; OR 2.60 P < 0.02; and OR 2.60 P < 0.01 respectively), which was attenuated in years 4 and 5 (OR 1.83, P = 0.10 and OR 1.50, P = 0.12).

CONCLUSION: This is the largest meta-analysis with 1921 patients, comparing non-HPV induced TSCC and HPV induced TSCC, looking at outcome and survival. HPV-positive had better OS and DFS.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app