We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Use of an Additional 19-G EBUS-TBNA Needle Increases the Diagnostic Yield of EBUS-TBNA.
Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology 2018 October
BACKGROUND: Although endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has an excellent diagnostic yield, there remain cases where the diagnosis is not obtained. We hypothesized that additional sampling with a 19-G EBUS-TBNA needle may increase diagnostic yield in a subset of cases where additional tissue sampling was required.
METHODS: Indications for use of the 19-G needle following 22-G sampling with rapid on-site cytologic examination were: (1) diagnostic uncertainty of the on-site cytopathologist (eg, nondiagnostic, probable lymphoma, etc.), (2) non-small cell lung cancer with probable need for molecular genetic and/or PD-L1 testing, or (3) need for a larger tissue sample for consideration of inclusion in a research protocol.
RESULTS: A 19-G EBUS-TBNA needle was utilized following standard sampling with a 22-G needle in 48 patients (50 sites) during the same procedure. Although the diagnostic yield between the needles was equivalent, the concordance rate was only 83%. The 19-G determined a diagnosis in 4 additional patients (8%) and provided additional histopathologic information in 6 other cases (12%). Conversely, in 3 cases (6%) diagnostic information was provided only by the 22-G needle. Compared with 22-G EBUS-TBNA alone, sampling with both the 22- and 19-G EBUS needles resulted in an increase in diagnostic yield from 92% to 99% (P=0.045) and a number needed to sample of 13 patients to provide one additional diagnosis. There were no significant complications.
CONCLUSION: In select cases where additional tissue may be needed, sampling with a 19-G EBUS needle following standard aspiration with a 22-G needle results in an increase in diagnostic yield.
METHODS: Indications for use of the 19-G needle following 22-G sampling with rapid on-site cytologic examination were: (1) diagnostic uncertainty of the on-site cytopathologist (eg, nondiagnostic, probable lymphoma, etc.), (2) non-small cell lung cancer with probable need for molecular genetic and/or PD-L1 testing, or (3) need for a larger tissue sample for consideration of inclusion in a research protocol.
RESULTS: A 19-G EBUS-TBNA needle was utilized following standard sampling with a 22-G needle in 48 patients (50 sites) during the same procedure. Although the diagnostic yield between the needles was equivalent, the concordance rate was only 83%. The 19-G determined a diagnosis in 4 additional patients (8%) and provided additional histopathologic information in 6 other cases (12%). Conversely, in 3 cases (6%) diagnostic information was provided only by the 22-G needle. Compared with 22-G EBUS-TBNA alone, sampling with both the 22- and 19-G EBUS needles resulted in an increase in diagnostic yield from 92% to 99% (P=0.045) and a number needed to sample of 13 patients to provide one additional diagnosis. There were no significant complications.
CONCLUSION: In select cases where additional tissue may be needed, sampling with a 19-G EBUS needle following standard aspiration with a 22-G needle results in an increase in diagnostic yield.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app