We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Outcomes and Complications of the Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) Intramedullary Nail: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 2018 September 11
OBJECTIVES: This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical outcomes and pooled complication rate of femoral, tibial, and humeral fracture fixation using SIGN nails. We aimed to compare the pooled rate of adverse events based on the country of study origin, acute versus delayed fracture fixation, and length of follow up.
METHODS: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE/Cochrane databases from 2000-2016 for English language studies. There was substantial heterogeneity among included studies. Therefore, we employed sub-group analysis of varying adverse events and removal of potential outlier studies based on the 'remove one' sensitivity analysis, to address the heterogeneity across studies. A funnel plot was drawn and inspected visually to assess publication bias. We reported pooled complication rates for each adverse event with 95% prediction interval (PI).
RESULTS: There were 14 studies with 47,169 cases across 58 different LMICs. The average age was 33 ± 14 years, with 83% male and 17% female. Sixty percent of SIGN nails utilized in these 14 studies were used in femur fracture fixation, 38% in tibial shaft fractures, and the remaining 2% for humeral shaft fractures. Approximately 23% of patients had follow-up data recorded. All studies that measured clinical outcome indicated that >90% achieved full weight-bearing status, favorable range of motion (knee range of motion >90 degrees according to the SIGN database), and radiographic or clinical union depending on the specific variable(s) measured in each study. The overall complication rate was 5.2% (4.4% - 6.4%). Malalignment (>5 degrees angulation in any plane) was the most common complication (7.6%), followed by delayed/non-union (6.9%), infection (5.9%), and hardware failure, (3.2%).
CONCLUSION: Overall, the use of SIGN nails in fixing femoral, tibial, and humeral shaft fractures demonstrates good results with a high rate of return to full weight-bearing and radiographic/clinical union. The most common complications when using the SIGN nail are malalignment, delayed/non-union, infection and hardware failure.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level-IV meta-analysis.
METHODS: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE/Cochrane databases from 2000-2016 for English language studies. There was substantial heterogeneity among included studies. Therefore, we employed sub-group analysis of varying adverse events and removal of potential outlier studies based on the 'remove one' sensitivity analysis, to address the heterogeneity across studies. A funnel plot was drawn and inspected visually to assess publication bias. We reported pooled complication rates for each adverse event with 95% prediction interval (PI).
RESULTS: There were 14 studies with 47,169 cases across 58 different LMICs. The average age was 33 ± 14 years, with 83% male and 17% female. Sixty percent of SIGN nails utilized in these 14 studies were used in femur fracture fixation, 38% in tibial shaft fractures, and the remaining 2% for humeral shaft fractures. Approximately 23% of patients had follow-up data recorded. All studies that measured clinical outcome indicated that >90% achieved full weight-bearing status, favorable range of motion (knee range of motion >90 degrees according to the SIGN database), and radiographic or clinical union depending on the specific variable(s) measured in each study. The overall complication rate was 5.2% (4.4% - 6.4%). Malalignment (>5 degrees angulation in any plane) was the most common complication (7.6%), followed by delayed/non-union (6.9%), infection (5.9%), and hardware failure, (3.2%).
CONCLUSION: Overall, the use of SIGN nails in fixing femoral, tibial, and humeral shaft fractures demonstrates good results with a high rate of return to full weight-bearing and radiographic/clinical union. The most common complications when using the SIGN nail are malalignment, delayed/non-union, infection and hardware failure.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level-IV meta-analysis.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app