We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
META-ANALYSIS
REVIEW
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of bicanalicular silicone intubation (SI) on dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) success rate in adult primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
DESIGN: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Ovid Medline, Google Scholar, and grey literature search was performed from inception to June 2017. All prospective DCR trials with randomization of SI were considered. Cases with non-SI or adjunctive mitomycin were excluded. Where possible we analysed only 1 eye from each subject. Random effects meta-analysis was performed.
RESULTS: We retrieved 1142 articles and after filtering there were 14 RCTs with a total of 1311 DCR cases. There were 444 external DCRs and pooled estimate showed risk ratio (RR) was 1.08 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.15). There were 867 predominantly endonasal DCR with RR 1.04 (95% CI 0.99-1.09). When all DCR modalities were combined the RR was 1.05 (95% CI 1.01-1.09).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was a 5% statistically significant improvement in DCR success rate with SI, but more endonasal DCR RCTs are required.
DESIGN: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Ovid Medline, Google Scholar, and grey literature search was performed from inception to June 2017. All prospective DCR trials with randomization of SI were considered. Cases with non-SI or adjunctive mitomycin were excluded. Where possible we analysed only 1 eye from each subject. Random effects meta-analysis was performed.
RESULTS: We retrieved 1142 articles and after filtering there were 14 RCTs with a total of 1311 DCR cases. There were 444 external DCRs and pooled estimate showed risk ratio (RR) was 1.08 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.15). There were 867 predominantly endonasal DCR with RR 1.04 (95% CI 0.99-1.09). When all DCR modalities were combined the RR was 1.05 (95% CI 1.01-1.09).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was a 5% statistically significant improvement in DCR success rate with SI, but more endonasal DCR RCTs are required.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app