We have located links that may give you full text access.
Autologous blood-derived products compared to corticosteroids for treatment of plantar fasciopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2018 October 23
OBJECTIVE: This review article evaluated the efficacy of autologous blood-derived products (ABPs), including whole blood (WB) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP), in reducing pain and improving function compared with corticosteroids (CS) for plantar fasciopathy (PF) patients.
DESIGN: Literature comparing ABP and CS for the treatment of PF was systematically reviewed. Twelve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and four quasi-experimental studies were included. The visual analogue scale pain score and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score were evaluated at 1.5, 3, and 6 months' follow-up. Subgroup analyses were performed concerning PRP preparation techniques, injection regiments, and study designs.
RESULTS: CS was found to reduce pain more effectively than WB at 1.5 months and 3 months, but the effect disappeared at 6 months. PRP reduced pain more effectively at 6 months post-injection than CS. However, there was no significant difference in the AOFAS score between PRP and CS injections at any time point. In the subgroup analyses, pain was significantly reduced at 6 months by self-prepared PRP, one-step separation PRP, PRP of more than 3 mL, and PRP without local analgesics.
CONCLUSION: The results of this meta-analysis suggest that PRP may provide a long-term effect in relieving pain in PF patients.
DESIGN: Literature comparing ABP and CS for the treatment of PF was systematically reviewed. Twelve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and four quasi-experimental studies were included. The visual analogue scale pain score and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score were evaluated at 1.5, 3, and 6 months' follow-up. Subgroup analyses were performed concerning PRP preparation techniques, injection regiments, and study designs.
RESULTS: CS was found to reduce pain more effectively than WB at 1.5 months and 3 months, but the effect disappeared at 6 months. PRP reduced pain more effectively at 6 months post-injection than CS. However, there was no significant difference in the AOFAS score between PRP and CS injections at any time point. In the subgroup analyses, pain was significantly reduced at 6 months by self-prepared PRP, one-step separation PRP, PRP of more than 3 mL, and PRP without local analgesics.
CONCLUSION: The results of this meta-analysis suggest that PRP may provide a long-term effect in relieving pain in PF patients.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app