COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of Nongated Chest CT and Dedicated Calcium Scoring CT for Coronary Calcium Quantification Using a 256-Dector Row CT Scanner.

Academic Radiology 2019 October
BACKGROUND: Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is a marker of atherosclerosis and an independent risk factor for cardiac-related mortality and frequently detected on noncontrast chest CT. We aimed to investigate the reliability and accuracy of determining CAC using noncontrast, nongated chest CT with 256-detector row.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1318 patients for chest examination were enrolled to undergo both nongated chest CT and dedicated calcium-scoring CT (CSCT) on a 256-detector row CT scanner. The chest CT was scanned in fast-helical mode with 8 cm collimation, 0.28 second rotation speed and pitch 0.992:1 to cover entire chest. CSCT used single prospective ECG-triggered cardiac axial mode with 0.28 second rotation speed covering only the heart. CAC scores (Agatston, mass, and volume) were determined using both image sets and were statistically compared.

RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of nongated chest CT for determining positive CAC was 94.8% (182/192) and 100%, respectively. The agreement in assessing the quantitative Agatston, volume, and mass scores between the nongated chest CT and CSCT was almost perfect, with the intraclass correlation coefficient values of 0.998, 0.999, and 0.999, respectively. Additionally, there was a good agreement in CAC quantification between the nongated chest CT and dedicated CSCT with small coefficient of variation: mass score (9.0%), volume score (9.5%), and Agatston score (12.6%).

CONCLUSION: Nongated chest CT with 256-detector row is a reliable imaging mode for detecting and quantifying calcifications in coronary arteries compared with dedicated calcium-scoring CT.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app