Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Systematic Review
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Clinical and radiographic results of partial versus total meniscectomy in patients with symptomatic discoid lateral meniscus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Some reports have noted favorable long-term clinical results with milder postoperative arthritic changes after total meniscectomy in symptomatic patients with torn discoid lateral meniscus (DLM). This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the clinical and radiographic results between partial and total meniscectomy in patients with symptomatic DLM.

METHODS: Studies were included in the meta-analysis if (1) they analysed patients who underwent arthroscopic surgeries for DLMs, (2) they directly compared clinical outcomes in patients treated with partial and total meniscectomies, (3) they analysed at least one parameter related to postoperative outcomes, including the Ikeuchi scale, and/or radiographic results including the Tapper and Hoover classification.

RESULTS: Eight studies were finally included. The proportion of the knees with excellent or good grade appeared to be higher in partial than in total meniscectomy group, but this difference did not reach statistical significance [128/158 (81.0%) vs. 87/131 (66.4%); OR 1.62; p=0.10; I2 =0%]. The pooled results of the proportion of normal cartilage status or mild chondral wear (grade 0 or 1 of the Tapper and Hoover classification) were significantly much higher with partial than with total meniscectomy [228/261 (87.4%) vs. 94/169 (55.6%); OR 9.08; p<0.001; I2 =57%].

CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed that the radiographic outcomes of DLM were better with partial meniscectomy with or without repair than with total meniscectomy, but their clinical outcomes were similar. The findings thus suggest that meniscal preservation would be a better option than total meniscectomy for symptomatic DLM.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, Systematic review and Meta-analysis.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app