We have located links that may give you full text access.
18 F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of cartilaginous bone neoplasms: the added value of tumor grading.
Annals of Nuclear Medicine 2019 August 9
OBJECTIVES: Cartilaginous bone tumors represent a wide variety of neoplasms ranging from benign to extremely aggressive malignant lesions. Unlike other tumors, the biopsy cannot easily predict the histological grade, sometimes not allowing choosing the best therapeutic approach. The aim of the study was to evaluate the ability of 18 F-FDG PET/CT to differentiate enchondroma from chondrosarcoma and to predict the histological grade as compared to biopsy.
METHODS: 18 F-FDG PET/CT of 95 patients with chondroid lesions were retrospectively evaluated. The best SUVmax cutoff to predict the post-surgical histological grade were correlated to those of biopsy and to several radiologic aggressiveness features, which were summarized in the parameter "Radiologic Aggressiveness Score" (AgSCORE).
RESULTS: A concordance between the preoperative biopsy and the definitive histological grade was observed overall in 78.3% of patients, the lowest accuracy (58.6%) being in the identification of intermediate/high-grade chondrosarcoma (G2/G3). The best SUVmax cutoff was 2.6 to discriminate enchondroma vs. low-grade chondrosarcoma (sensitivity 0.68, specificity 0.86), 3.7 to differentiate low-grade vs. intermediate/high-grade chondrosarcoma (sensitivity 0.83, specificity 0.84) and 7.7 to differentiate intermediate/high-grade vs. dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma (sensitivity 0.92, specificity 0.9). The AgSCORE also showed a high accuracy to differentiate between G1 and G2/G3 chondrosarcoma (cutoff = 4; sensitivity 0.76; specificity 0.89). An even higher accuracy was observed in those cases in which both SUVmax and AgSCORE cutoff were concordant.
CONCLUSIONS: Results in this large series of patients suggest a potential role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT for histological grading of cartilaginous tumors, thus helping the orthopedic surgeon towards the most appropriate surgical procedure.
METHODS: 18 F-FDG PET/CT of 95 patients with chondroid lesions were retrospectively evaluated. The best SUVmax cutoff to predict the post-surgical histological grade were correlated to those of biopsy and to several radiologic aggressiveness features, which were summarized in the parameter "Radiologic Aggressiveness Score" (AgSCORE).
RESULTS: A concordance between the preoperative biopsy and the definitive histological grade was observed overall in 78.3% of patients, the lowest accuracy (58.6%) being in the identification of intermediate/high-grade chondrosarcoma (G2/G3). The best SUVmax cutoff was 2.6 to discriminate enchondroma vs. low-grade chondrosarcoma (sensitivity 0.68, specificity 0.86), 3.7 to differentiate low-grade vs. intermediate/high-grade chondrosarcoma (sensitivity 0.83, specificity 0.84) and 7.7 to differentiate intermediate/high-grade vs. dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma (sensitivity 0.92, specificity 0.9). The AgSCORE also showed a high accuracy to differentiate between G1 and G2/G3 chondrosarcoma (cutoff = 4; sensitivity 0.76; specificity 0.89). An even higher accuracy was observed in those cases in which both SUVmax and AgSCORE cutoff were concordant.
CONCLUSIONS: Results in this large series of patients suggest a potential role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT for histological grading of cartilaginous tumors, thus helping the orthopedic surgeon towards the most appropriate surgical procedure.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app