Comparative Study
Journal Article
Validation Study
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Assessment and validation of a screening questionnaire for the diagnosis of pediatric bladder and bowel dysfunction.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD) is a common problem in children. However, the current ability to diagnosis and quantify pediatric BBD is limited as only a few validated instruments exist. In addition, the current questionnaires are limited by their lack of psychometric processing and methods of validation. To address these issues, the authors developed a new questionnaire to objectively diagnose pediatric BBD symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of this newly devised objective instrument in diagnosing and quantifying the symptomatology of BBD in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: An 18-item, 5-point questionnaire was developed using both a literature review and expert opinions. The total questionnaire score could range from 0 to 72. Questions were subgrouped into six symptom categories: (1) nocturnal enuresis, (2) lower urinary tract symptoms, (3) urinary holding, (4) infrequent urination, (5) bowel symptoms, and (6) daytime urinary incontinence. The questionnaire also assessed the degree of bother associated with the symptoms. Patients were divided into cases and controls, and these two groups were compared.

DISCUSSION/RESULTS: A total of 1265 new patients (758 cases and 507 controls) completed the new BBD questionnaire. The mean age of the whole study cohort was 9.5 years (range, 3-19 years). The total mean questionnaire score was significantly higher at 23 (3-58) in the cases, compared with 8 (0-35) in the controls (p < 0.001) (Summary Figure). Reliability analysis of the 18-item instrument showed a Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient of 0.80 for the scale.

CONCLUSIONS: This new instrument provides a valid and reliable method for diagnosis of pediatric BBD and classification of patients into subcategories of BBD based on their specific symptoms.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app