JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Anti-herpesvirus prophylaxis, pre-emptive treatment or no treatment in adults undergoing allogeneic transplant for hematological disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Herpesvirideae infections incur significant morbidity and indirect effects on mortality among allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) recipients.

OBJECTIVES: To study the effects of antivirals prevention strategies among hemato-oncological individuals undergoing allo-HCT.

DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase and LILACS. We further searched for conference proceedings and trial registries.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY: Randomized-controlled trials.

PARTICIPANTS: Adults with hematological malignancy undergoing allo-HCT.

INTERVENTIONS: Anti-viral prophylaxis vs. no treatment/placebo or pre-emptive treatment and pre-emptive treatment vs. prophylaxis with the same agent.

METHODS: Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted computing pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and the inconsistency measure (I2 ). The certainty of the evidence was appraised by GRADE.

RESULTS: We included 22 RCTs. Anti-viral prophylaxis reduced all-cause mortality (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.7 to 0.99; N trials=15, I2 =0%), CMV disease (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.85; N=15, I2 =20%) and HSV disease (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.43; N=13, I2 =18%) compared to no treatment/placebo or pre-emptive treatment, all with high-certainty evidence. Furthermore, antivirals reduced HSV infection, CMV pneumonitis, CMV infection and VZV disease. Anti-CMV prophylaxis (+/- pre-emptive treatment) compared to pre-emptive treatment alone reduced non-significantly all-cause mortality (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.6 to 1.02; N=8, I2 =0%), CMV disease (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.97; N=9, I2 =30%) and HSV disease (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.67; N=4, I2 =0%) with high-certainty evidence, as well CMV and HSV infections. Antiviral prophylaxis did not result in increased adverse event rates overall or more discontinuation due to adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS: Antiviral prophylaxis directed against herpesviruses is highly effective and safe, reducing mortality, HSV and CMV disease, as well as herpesvirus reactivations among allogeneic HCT recipients. Anti-CMV prophylaxis is more effective than pre-emptive treatment alone with respect to HSV and CMV disease and infection.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app