We have located links that may give you full text access.
Morbidity in Patients With Separation of Cartilaginous Framework: Temporoparietal Fascia Flap and Treatment With Dermal Regeneration Template.
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 2020 January
BACKGROUND: The full creation of an ear requires 2 reconstruction stages. In the second stage of reconstruction, the cartilaginous framework placed at first stage is separated from the head creating an auriculocephalic sulcus. Then a piece of rib cartilage is placed in the sulcus to maintain this separation and is covered with tissue that allows the integration of a full-thickness skin graft.
METHODS: A descriptive study based on the pre and postoperative medical records and photographic archives of patients diagnosed with microtia who underwent separation of the cartilaginous framework from February 2010 to July 2015 in the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department at Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González.
RESULTS: Fifty-four patients met the selection criteria. The temporoparietal fascial flap was performed on 85% (n = 46), and 8 cases with random occipito-temporal fascial flap in association to a dermal regeneration template. The average time at the operating room was 177 minutes in patients with temporoparietal fascial flap versus 84.5 minutes in dermal regeneration template. The complication rate was 25.9% (n = 14), being similar rate with both techniques.
CONCLUSIONS: Coverage with dermal regeneration template and random occipito-temporal fascia flap as an alternative use instead of temporoparietal fascial flaps, offers good postoperative results, lower operating times, and similar rate of complications, with the advantage of producing no visible scars and reserve the temporoparietal fascial flap for possible exposure of the cartilaginous framework.
METHODS: A descriptive study based on the pre and postoperative medical records and photographic archives of patients diagnosed with microtia who underwent separation of the cartilaginous framework from February 2010 to July 2015 in the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department at Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González.
RESULTS: Fifty-four patients met the selection criteria. The temporoparietal fascial flap was performed on 85% (n = 46), and 8 cases with random occipito-temporal fascial flap in association to a dermal regeneration template. The average time at the operating room was 177 minutes in patients with temporoparietal fascial flap versus 84.5 minutes in dermal regeneration template. The complication rate was 25.9% (n = 14), being similar rate with both techniques.
CONCLUSIONS: Coverage with dermal regeneration template and random occipito-temporal fascia flap as an alternative use instead of temporoparietal fascial flaps, offers good postoperative results, lower operating times, and similar rate of complications, with the advantage of producing no visible scars and reserve the temporoparietal fascial flap for possible exposure of the cartilaginous framework.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app