We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Ultrasound detection of endometrial cancer in women with postmenopausal bleeding: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gynecologic Oncology 2020 June
OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of endometrial thickness (ET) cut-offs for detecting endometrial cancer (EC) in women with postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) and evaluate the clinical utility of additional ultrasound measures such as endometrial volume (EV), vascular flow index (VFI), vascularization index (VI), and uterine artery flow index (FI).
METHODS: Clinicaltrials.gov and MEDLINE database via PubMed were queried for studies published between 1/1990 and 3/2016 using specific MeSH terms. Original, peer-reviewed cohort studies reporting EC outcomes and specific ultrasound findings by PMB status were included.
RESULTS: Study design, country, clinical setting inclusion/exclusion criteria, aggregate study-level demographic and clinical data were extracted from 44 studies including 17,339 women with PMB and 1341 cases of EC (7.7%). In women with PMB and EC (n = 417), pooled mean ET was 16.4 mm (95% CI, 14.8-18.1 mm). In women with PMB without EC, pooled mean ET was 4.1 mm. 31 studies reported outcomes using different ET cut-off values ranging from 3 to 20 mm. Compared to ≥3 or 4 mm, a cutoff of ≥5 mm had similar sensitivity (96.2, 95%CI 92.3, 98.1) with improved specificity for EC (51.5, 95%CI 42.3-60.7), allowing to reduce the rate of invasive workup for PMB by 17%. EV, VI, VFI, and FI were significantly correlated with EC, but performance of specific cut-offs was not analyzed due to limited data.
CONCLUSION: Among women with PMB mean ET is substantially higher in women with EC compared to those without EC. An ET cutoff of ≥5 mm shows an acceptable tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of EC.
METHODS: Clinicaltrials.gov and MEDLINE database via PubMed were queried for studies published between 1/1990 and 3/2016 using specific MeSH terms. Original, peer-reviewed cohort studies reporting EC outcomes and specific ultrasound findings by PMB status were included.
RESULTS: Study design, country, clinical setting inclusion/exclusion criteria, aggregate study-level demographic and clinical data were extracted from 44 studies including 17,339 women with PMB and 1341 cases of EC (7.7%). In women with PMB and EC (n = 417), pooled mean ET was 16.4 mm (95% CI, 14.8-18.1 mm). In women with PMB without EC, pooled mean ET was 4.1 mm. 31 studies reported outcomes using different ET cut-off values ranging from 3 to 20 mm. Compared to ≥3 or 4 mm, a cutoff of ≥5 mm had similar sensitivity (96.2, 95%CI 92.3, 98.1) with improved specificity for EC (51.5, 95%CI 42.3-60.7), allowing to reduce the rate of invasive workup for PMB by 17%. EV, VI, VFI, and FI were significantly correlated with EC, but performance of specific cut-offs was not analyzed due to limited data.
CONCLUSION: Among women with PMB mean ET is substantially higher in women with EC compared to those without EC. An ET cutoff of ≥5 mm shows an acceptable tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of EC.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app