We have located links that may give you full text access.
A comparison of balloon and nonballoon gastrostomy tubes in children.
Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2020 May
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare primary outcomes following insertion of balloon and nonballoon gastrostomy tubes (G-tubes).
METHODS: A retrospective chart review over a 5-year period comparing the need for emergency, radiologic, or operative interventions between balloon and nonballoon G-tube devices was performed.
RESULTS: 145 patient charts were reviewed (46.8% female, 53.1% male). The indication for G-tube insertion was failure to thrive in 83.4%. Average age at insertion was 4.3 years (0-17.9 years). 37.2% had a balloon type G-tube, and 62.8% had a nonballoon type. Patients with a nonballoon device had 1.14 (0-15) ER visits related to the G-tube vs. 0.48 (0-6) visits with a balloon device. Of the ER visits for patients with a nonballoon device, 26.9% were replaced in ER, 38.5% in radiology, and 34.6% required an operation for replacement. For patients with a balloon device, 47.8% were replaced in the ER, 52.2% were replaced in radiology (GJ), and none required operative replacement. The majority of patients who initially had a nonballoon G-tube placed required a second operation for device change (95.7%). Patients with nonballoon devices required significantly more operations (average 2.55, range 0-16) vs patients with balloon devices (average 0.40, range 0-3) (p < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Balloon-type G-tubes require less ER visits and operative interventions compared to nonballoon G-tubes.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: C.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review over a 5-year period comparing the need for emergency, radiologic, or operative interventions between balloon and nonballoon G-tube devices was performed.
RESULTS: 145 patient charts were reviewed (46.8% female, 53.1% male). The indication for G-tube insertion was failure to thrive in 83.4%. Average age at insertion was 4.3 years (0-17.9 years). 37.2% had a balloon type G-tube, and 62.8% had a nonballoon type. Patients with a nonballoon device had 1.14 (0-15) ER visits related to the G-tube vs. 0.48 (0-6) visits with a balloon device. Of the ER visits for patients with a nonballoon device, 26.9% were replaced in ER, 38.5% in radiology, and 34.6% required an operation for replacement. For patients with a balloon device, 47.8% were replaced in the ER, 52.2% were replaced in radiology (GJ), and none required operative replacement. The majority of patients who initially had a nonballoon G-tube placed required a second operation for device change (95.7%). Patients with nonballoon devices required significantly more operations (average 2.55, range 0-16) vs patients with balloon devices (average 0.40, range 0-3) (p < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Balloon-type G-tubes require less ER visits and operative interventions compared to nonballoon G-tubes.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: C.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app