Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Reassessing Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin Induction in Kidney Transplantation (RETHINK): An Analysis of the North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies (NAPRTCS) Registry.

Transplantation Direct 2020 September
BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) dose used for induction immunosuppression in pediatric kidney transplants. We aimed to identify whether a lower rATG dose provides safe and effective immunosuppression compared with a higher dose.

METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all first-time kidney transplant recipients (aged <21 y) in the North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies registry since 1998 on mycophenolate mofetil- and tacrolimus-based immunosuppression with rATG induction. An a priori cutoff of 7.5 mg/kg cumulative rATG dose was used to identify low (<7.5 mg/kg) and high (≥7.5 mg/kg) exposure groups. Primary outcome was time to first-acute rejection episode. Secondary outcomes included graft function, patient survival, hospitalizations due to infections, and time to first-posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder episode.

RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-five patients met inclusion criteria (59% male, 49% whites, 26% blacks, 38% living donor source). Median cumulative rATG dose was 6.8 mg/kg with a median of 5 doses and a median 1.5 mg/kg/dose introduced at a median of postoperative 0 days. Sixty-four percent received <7.5 mg/kg total rATG. There was no difference in age at transplant, gender, race, end-stage renal disease causes, or HLA mismatch among groups. Time to first-acute rejection was similar ( P  = 0.07). There was no significant difference in graft or patient survival or time to posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Hospitalization for infection rates was similar.

CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate a wide variation in cumulative rATG induction dose. A smaller rATG dose <7.5 mg/kg may provide effective and safe immunosuppression compared with a higher dose.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app