We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Systematic Review
Prevalence of interstitial lung disease in polymyositis and dermatomyositis: A meta-analysis from 2000 to 2020.
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism 2021 Februrary
OBJECTIVE: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the most important prognostic factor for mortality in patients with polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM), but the prevalence of ILD in PM/DM may vary between countries. The aim of this study was to determine the overall prevalence of ILD in global patients with PM/DM.
METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review of studies published from Jan 1, 2000 to April 30, 2020 on ILD and PM/DM. We extracted data and pooled the prevalence by using a random-effect model due to high heterogeneity. Heterogeneity was assessed by subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 34 studies with 10,130 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Pooled data demonstrated that the global prevalence of ILD in patients with PM/DM was 0.41 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-0.48). However, this prevalence varied with geographical locations and time trends. The prevalence of ILD in PM/DM was 0.5 (95% CI 0.42-0.57) in Asia, 0.23 (95% CI 0.15-0.31) in America, and 0.26 (95% CI 0.18-0.34) in Europe. A higher prevalence of ILD was reported in studies published in 2011-2015 (0.43, 95% CI 0.34-0.52) and 2016-2020 (0.45, 95% CI 0.35-0.54), compared with those published in 2000-2010 (0.27, 95% CI 0.16-0.39). The pooled prevalence of ILD in patients with DM, PM, and clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis subtype was 0.42 (95% CI 0.35-0.49), 0.35 (95% CI 0.27-0.42), and 0.53 (95% CI 0.32-0.74), respectively. Patients with anti-Jo-1 and anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibodies were more likely to develop ILD than other myositis-specific autoantibodies.
CONCLUSION: The global prevalence of ILD in patients with PM/DM was approximately 41% and the condition was predominant in Asians. This highlights potential genetic and environmental differences in the pathogenesis of ILD in patients with PM/DM. More studies are required to elucidate the specific associations.
METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review of studies published from Jan 1, 2000 to April 30, 2020 on ILD and PM/DM. We extracted data and pooled the prevalence by using a random-effect model due to high heterogeneity. Heterogeneity was assessed by subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 34 studies with 10,130 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Pooled data demonstrated that the global prevalence of ILD in patients with PM/DM was 0.41 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-0.48). However, this prevalence varied with geographical locations and time trends. The prevalence of ILD in PM/DM was 0.5 (95% CI 0.42-0.57) in Asia, 0.23 (95% CI 0.15-0.31) in America, and 0.26 (95% CI 0.18-0.34) in Europe. A higher prevalence of ILD was reported in studies published in 2011-2015 (0.43, 95% CI 0.34-0.52) and 2016-2020 (0.45, 95% CI 0.35-0.54), compared with those published in 2000-2010 (0.27, 95% CI 0.16-0.39). The pooled prevalence of ILD in patients with DM, PM, and clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis subtype was 0.42 (95% CI 0.35-0.49), 0.35 (95% CI 0.27-0.42), and 0.53 (95% CI 0.32-0.74), respectively. Patients with anti-Jo-1 and anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibodies were more likely to develop ILD than other myositis-specific autoantibodies.
CONCLUSION: The global prevalence of ILD in patients with PM/DM was approximately 41% and the condition was predominant in Asians. This highlights potential genetic and environmental differences in the pathogenesis of ILD in patients with PM/DM. More studies are required to elucidate the specific associations.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app