How Does Octyl-2-Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive Compare With Prolene Sutures in Cleft Lip Repair?

PURPOSE: Comparative evidence of the usefulness of octyl-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive in cleft lip epidermal skin closure especially in Africans is still lacking. This study aimed to compare the outcome of wound healing after the use of Dermabond tissue adhesive and 5/0 Prolene sutures in cleft lip repair.

METHODS: This was a prospective randomized controlled clinical study. The sampled population was patients undergoing cleft lip repair at a tertiary health facility in Lagos, Nigeria. Study patients were randomly allocated to either group A (Dermabond) or group B (suture). The predictor variable was the type of material used in skin closure; the primary outcome variable was the esthetics of the resulting scar, and secondary outcome variables were wound healing complications. Assessment of the 3-month postoperative wound scar was performed using the cosmetic visual analog scale (CVAS) and the Hollander Wound Evaluation scale (HWES). Calculated sample size was 14 participants per group. Descriptive and comparative statistics were computed, and the P value was set at <0.05.

RESULTS: Analysis of result included 38 participants. Median age was 4 months and 52.6% were women. Two cases (5.3%) of wound healing complications were recorded (1 in each group). Blinded evaluation of the 3-month postoperative photographs yielded a mean CVAS score of 86.0 (±11.2) and HWES score of 5.0 (±0.9) for group A and a mean CVAS score of 76.5 (±14.5) and HWES score of 4.5 (±1.1) for group B. There was no statistically significant difference between these 2 groups based on the CVAS (P = .052) and HWES (P = .152).

CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest Dermabond offers a comparable cosmetic outcome as 5/0 Prolene suture in epidermal closure of cleft lip. There was no statistically significant difference in wound complications and wound cosmetic scores between the 2 groups.