We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Rupture of posterior tibial tendon: CT and MR imaging with surgical correlation.
Radiology 1988 October
Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging were performed in 32 cases of clinically suspected chronic tears of the posterior tibial tendon. Surgery was performed in 22 patients (69%). Each case was classified radiographically and surgically as normal or a type 1, type 2, or type 3 rupture. The sensitivity and specificity of CT were 90% and 100%, respectively, while those of MR imaging were 95% and 100%. The accuracy in detecting ruptures was 91% for CT and 96% for MR imaging. The overall accuracy, which reflected the percentage of cases correctly diagnosed as well as those correctly classified, was 59% for CT and 73% for MR imaging. Although the differences between the CT and MR imaging parameters were not statistically significant (possibly due to the small population), the results suggest that MR imaging is the method of choice for detecting ruptures of the posterior tibial tendon. MR imaging provided greater definition of tendon outline, vertical splits, synovial fluid, edema, and degenerated tissue. CT was superior to MR imaging in showing associated bone abnormalities such as periostitis, subtalar osteoarthritis, and subtalar dislocation.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app