We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Review
Surgical approach to prune-belly syndrome: A review of our series and novel surgical technique.
Journal of Pediatric Urology 2021 October
INTRODUCTION: Surgical management of children with Prune-belly syndrome (PBS) can be divided into three categories: urinary tract reconstruction, abdominal wall reconstruction, and orchidopexy. Adequate repair of the abdominal wall by abdominoplasty at an early age, allows an adequate aesthetic appearance, but also allows a correct development of walking, breathing, defecation and urination.
OBJECTIVE: To present a novel surgical technique for abdominal wall reconstruction, which combines plication with complete overlap of the fascia and neoumbilicoplasty with an island flap rotated on itself.
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of the patients with PBS who underwent surgery in our center between 2009 and 2020. A new abdominoplasty technique was performed, which consists of plication with complete overlap of the fascia, as well as a neoumbilicoplasty with an island flap rotated on itself. The skin is then well freed from the rest of planes, and the plication is performed with complete overlapping of the muscle-aponeurotic plane from one side to the other. At this time, the interposition of some type of reinforcement material (mesh) may be required in the event of complete absence or insufficient presence of the fascia and muscle.
RESULTS: Abdominoplasty was performed in four patients. In all patients, bilateral orchidopexy was performed in the same surgical procedure for intra-abdominal testicles. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 10,5 years and the average admission time was 4 days. There were no short-term or long-term complications. Average follow-up time was 7 years. All patients and their families are satisfied with the aesthetic result obtained.
DISCUSSSION: Abdominoplasty in patients with PBS in addition to aesthetic reconstruction, brings significant improvements to wandering, breathing, urination and defecation, improving the quality of life of the patient. Compared to the techniques described, the abdominoplasty we propose makes it possible to easily improve the abdominal wall support by means of meshes or synthetic devices if necessary and allows the evaluation and correction of cryptorchidism or other associated renal abnormalities in the same surgical act, as it allows full abdominal exposure. Likewise our modified abdominoplasty allows the creation of the new umbilicus in a more anatomical way, rectifying its natural position.
CONCLUSION: In our experience, this modified surgical technique for abdominal wall repair is a novel procedure in the PBS approach, easily reproducible, which provides good aesthetic results in our series of cases.
OBJECTIVE: To present a novel surgical technique for abdominal wall reconstruction, which combines plication with complete overlap of the fascia and neoumbilicoplasty with an island flap rotated on itself.
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of the patients with PBS who underwent surgery in our center between 2009 and 2020. A new abdominoplasty technique was performed, which consists of plication with complete overlap of the fascia, as well as a neoumbilicoplasty with an island flap rotated on itself. The skin is then well freed from the rest of planes, and the plication is performed with complete overlapping of the muscle-aponeurotic plane from one side to the other. At this time, the interposition of some type of reinforcement material (mesh) may be required in the event of complete absence or insufficient presence of the fascia and muscle.
RESULTS: Abdominoplasty was performed in four patients. In all patients, bilateral orchidopexy was performed in the same surgical procedure for intra-abdominal testicles. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 10,5 years and the average admission time was 4 days. There were no short-term or long-term complications. Average follow-up time was 7 years. All patients and their families are satisfied with the aesthetic result obtained.
DISCUSSSION: Abdominoplasty in patients with PBS in addition to aesthetic reconstruction, brings significant improvements to wandering, breathing, urination and defecation, improving the quality of life of the patient. Compared to the techniques described, the abdominoplasty we propose makes it possible to easily improve the abdominal wall support by means of meshes or synthetic devices if necessary and allows the evaluation and correction of cryptorchidism or other associated renal abnormalities in the same surgical act, as it allows full abdominal exposure. Likewise our modified abdominoplasty allows the creation of the new umbilicus in a more anatomical way, rectifying its natural position.
CONCLUSION: In our experience, this modified surgical technique for abdominal wall repair is a novel procedure in the PBS approach, easily reproducible, which provides good aesthetic results in our series of cases.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows.Endocrine Reviews 2024 April 28
The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 26
British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults.Gut 2024 April 17
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Ventilator Waveforms May Give Clues to Expiratory Muscle Activity.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2024 April 25
Systemic lupus erythematosus.Lancet 2024 April 18
Acute Kidney Injury and Electrolyte Imbalances Caused by Dapagliflozin Short-Term Use.Pharmaceuticals 2024 March 27
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app