We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Review
Systematic Review
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous carpal tunnel release: A systematic review.
OBJECTIVE: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral entrapment mononeuropathy. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the reported clinical effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous carpal tunnel release (USCTR) for the treatment of CTS.
LITERATURE SURVEY: PubMed, EMBASE, and ScienceDirect databases were queried from database inception to February 20, 2021, to identify clinical studies on USCTR.
METHODOLOGY: Two reviewers independently completed title, abstract, and full-text screening, and they extracted data in duplicate for analysis. Procedure techniques, outcome measures, and complications were descriptively analyzed.
SYNTHESIS: Eighty-seven studies were eligible for screening. Twenty studies (three randomized controlled trials, three prospective cohort studies, and 14 case series) met inclusion criteria, with a total of 1772 USCTR cases. The overall level of evidence was very low, with seven studies with at least moderate risk of bias. Thirteen studies exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity Scale (BCTQ-SS) and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Functional Status Scale (BCTQ-FS), and six studies exceeded the MCID for the Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder & Hand (QDASH). Five studies reported statistically significant improvement in these functional outcome measures as early as the first week post-procedure. A major complication occurred in one patient who developed suspected compartment syndrome, and minor complications were reported in 24 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on very low level of evidence, early studies suggest that USCTR may be an effective treatment for CTS, with potential for short post-procedure recovery times.
LITERATURE SURVEY: PubMed, EMBASE, and ScienceDirect databases were queried from database inception to February 20, 2021, to identify clinical studies on USCTR.
METHODOLOGY: Two reviewers independently completed title, abstract, and full-text screening, and they extracted data in duplicate for analysis. Procedure techniques, outcome measures, and complications were descriptively analyzed.
SYNTHESIS: Eighty-seven studies were eligible for screening. Twenty studies (three randomized controlled trials, three prospective cohort studies, and 14 case series) met inclusion criteria, with a total of 1772 USCTR cases. The overall level of evidence was very low, with seven studies with at least moderate risk of bias. Thirteen studies exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity Scale (BCTQ-SS) and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Functional Status Scale (BCTQ-FS), and six studies exceeded the MCID for the Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder & Hand (QDASH). Five studies reported statistically significant improvement in these functional outcome measures as early as the first week post-procedure. A major complication occurred in one patient who developed suspected compartment syndrome, and minor complications were reported in 24 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on very low level of evidence, early studies suggest that USCTR may be an effective treatment for CTS, with potential for short post-procedure recovery times.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app