We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Review
Preoperative ocular coherence tomographic prognosticators of visual acuity after idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery.
International Ophthalmology 2022 October
PURPOSE: To provide a current review of the evidence for the utility of preoperative ocular coherence tomography (OCT) parameters in prognosticating postoperative visual acuity and visual improvement after idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery. To determine which OCT bio-markers are most useful in this regard and where future studies may apply more emphasis.
METHODS: An extensive search of the PubMed database was performed for studies investigating this relationship. Key search terms included: idiopathic, epiretinal membrane, surgery, peel, vitrectomy, vision, outcomes, visual acuity, ocular coherence tomography, central foveal thickness, foveal contour, foveal morphology, ectopic inner foveal layers, inner retinal layers, inner retinal irregularity index, outer retinal layers, ellipsoid zone, interdigitation zone, photoreceptor outer segment length, central bouquet abnormality, staging, choroidoscleral irregularity, ganglion cell and nerve fibre layers, inner and outer plexiform layers, inner and outer nuclear layers. Forty-nine peer-reviewed articles were included in this review. These consisted of 28 retrospective studies [1-3,13,16-18,20,23-29,32-36,38,40,42-47], 17 prospective studies[6-12,14,19,21,22,30,31,37,41,48,49], 2 reviews [4,39] and 2 systematic reviews [5,15].
CONCLUSION: The weight of literary evidence seems to support photoreceptor integrity as the most consistent OCT marker of better postoperative visual acuity. This includes analysis of ellipsoid and interdigitation zones as well as photoreceptor outer segment length. However, the newer OCT staging system proposed by Govetto et al. (2017) fulfils a need for a clinically useful and evidence-based OCT classification. It may be the way forward in prognosticating ERM surgical outcomes by preoperative stratification. There is insufficient evidence to suggest the other discussed parameters in this review as useful prognosticators of postoperative visual acuity.
METHODS: An extensive search of the PubMed database was performed for studies investigating this relationship. Key search terms included: idiopathic, epiretinal membrane, surgery, peel, vitrectomy, vision, outcomes, visual acuity, ocular coherence tomography, central foveal thickness, foveal contour, foveal morphology, ectopic inner foveal layers, inner retinal layers, inner retinal irregularity index, outer retinal layers, ellipsoid zone, interdigitation zone, photoreceptor outer segment length, central bouquet abnormality, staging, choroidoscleral irregularity, ganglion cell and nerve fibre layers, inner and outer plexiform layers, inner and outer nuclear layers. Forty-nine peer-reviewed articles were included in this review. These consisted of 28 retrospective studies [1-3,13,16-18,20,23-29,32-36,38,40,42-47], 17 prospective studies[6-12,14,19,21,22,30,31,37,41,48,49], 2 reviews [4,39] and 2 systematic reviews [5,15].
CONCLUSION: The weight of literary evidence seems to support photoreceptor integrity as the most consistent OCT marker of better postoperative visual acuity. This includes analysis of ellipsoid and interdigitation zones as well as photoreceptor outer segment length. However, the newer OCT staging system proposed by Govetto et al. (2017) fulfils a need for a clinically useful and evidence-based OCT classification. It may be the way forward in prognosticating ERM surgical outcomes by preoperative stratification. There is insufficient evidence to suggest the other discussed parameters in this review as useful prognosticators of postoperative visual acuity.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app