Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Surgical Treatment of Meatal Stenosis: Lessons Learned from the Pediatric Urology Practice.

Urology 2023 January
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the indications for surgery and outcome of meatotomy and meatoplasty in a big cohort of children.

METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 2211 children who underwent either meatotomy or meatoplasty between 2009 and 2020 utilizing the same operative setup. For continuous data, we performed t-test and Mann-Whitney U test. For categorical data, chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test was used. A binary logistic regression model was used to compare the indications for surgery between the groups.

RESULTS: Of 2211 children, 1906 underwent meatotomy and 305 meatoplasty. The mean age was 5 years (range: 1m-15y) and there was no age difference between the groups. There was no difference between duration of surgery, recovery time, or complication rates between the groups. Deviated stream was the most frequent indication for treatment 1477 (67%). On Univariate logistic regression children with the following indications: dysuria, meatitis, and urinary retention had increased odds toward meatoplasty, while the indication of deviated stream had increased odds toward meatotomy. On Multivariate Logistic regression only deviated stream (Odd-ratios 1.47, P: .005) and urinary retention (Odds-ratio 4.5, P: .027) remained significant for meatotomy and meatoplasty respectively. Eleven (0.58%) children who underwent meatotomy developed recurrent Urethral Meatal Stenosis and underwent another surgery. Sixty-nine children (3.6%) after meatotomy required manual opening of the meatus on the first post-operative visit. None of the children, who underwent meatoplasty needed reoperation.

CONCLUSION: Meatotomy had a higher reoperation rate and frequently required manual meatal spreading in early postoperative period. We believe meatoplasty is a preferable surgery for pediatric UMS.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app