Journal Article
Systematic Review
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Ultrasound versus fine needle aspiration for the initial evaluation of pediatric cervical lymphadenopathy-A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Cervical lymphadenopathy is a frequent finding in children that poses diagnostic challenges. We sought to compare the utility of fine needle aspiration (FNA) with ultrasound (US) for evaluating pediatric cervical lymphadenopathy based on published literature.

STUDY DESIGN: In October 2019, we performed a comprehensive electronic search of PubMed, OVID (MEDLINE), EMBASE, and Scopus databases. Two authors independently screened and assessed full-text reports of potentially eligible studies. We compared sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value estimates, and balanced accuracy for determining the underlying etiology of lymphadenopathy.

RESULTS: The initial search returned 7736 possible studies, of which 31 met the criteria for inclusion. A total of 25 studies were included in the final analysis, with a total of 4721 patients, of which 52.8% were male. Of these, 9 (36.0%) examined US, and 16 (64%) examined fine needle aspiration. The pooled balanced accuracy for determining etiology was 87.7% for US and 92.9% for FNA. Reactive lymphadenopathy was identified in 47.9%, 9.2% were malignant, 12.6% were granulomatous, and 6.6% were non-diagnostic.

CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review, US was identified as an accurate initial diagnostic imaging modality in children. Fine needle aspiration was found to play a significant role in ruling out malignant lesions and potentially avoiding excisional biopsy.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app