Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of the long-term efficacy and safety of multiple endoscopic rubber band ligations in a single session for varying grades of internal hemorrhoids.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the number of ligation bands for varying grades of internal hemorrhoids (IH) in a single session of endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL).

AIMS: The aims of this study were to investigate this issue.

METHODS: Patients with IH were treated with ERBL. The primary endpoint was no hemorrhoid symptoms 6 weeks after ERBL. The secondary endpoints were postoperative complications and recurrence.

RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three eligible patients met the inclusion criteria, and 3 patients were excluded. The average bands were 3.9 ± 1.1, and grade II hemorrhoids required significantly fewer bands than grade III hemorrhoids (3.45 ± 0.85 vs 4.35 ± 1.06, P = 0.000). 78.8% of patients achieved the primary endpoint. The efficacy of grade II hemorrhoids was higher than that of grade III hemorrhoids (87.8% vs 69.2%). The incidence of postoperative complications was not significantly correlated with the grade of hemorrhoids (P = 0.201) and the number of bands (P = 0.886). The median follow-up time was 14.3 ± 7.9 (1.3-30.9) months. The overall recurrence rate was 25.0%, with grade III significantly higher than grade I-II (32.8% vs 14.6%, P = 0.027). For grade III hemorrhoids, the recurrence rate was lower with more than 4 bands of ligation than with less than 4 bands (26.5% vs 53.3%).

CONCLUSIONS: The average ERBL treatment of IH requires nearly four bands, and grade II hemorrhoids require less banding than grade III hemorrhoids, while the efficacy was better. Increasing the number of bands improves the treatment efficacy for grade III IH, which could be a strategy to reduce the recurrence rate without increasing postoperative complications.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app