TDABC Cost Comparison of Osteoid Osteoma Ablation Techniques.

OBJECTIVE: Compare the cost of performing an osteoid osteoma (OO) ablation using cone beam CT (CBCT) with overlay fluoroscopic guidance to ablation using conventional CT (CCT) guidance and microwave ablation (MWA) to radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

METHODS: An 11-year retrospective study was performed of all patients undergoing OO ablation. Ablation equipment included a Cool tip radiofrequency ablation (RFA) probe (Covidien, Minneapolis, MN) or a Neuwave PR microwave ablation (MWA) probe (Ethicon, Rariton, NJ). The room times as well as immediate recovery time were recorded for each case. Cost analysis was then performed using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) for rate dependent variables including salaries, equipment depreciation, room time, and certain supplies. Time independent costs included the disposable IR supplies and ablation systems. Costs were reported for each service providing care and using conventional cost accounting methods with variable and fixed expenditures.

RESULTS: A total of 91 patients underwent 96 ablation procedures in either CBCT (n=66) or CCT (n=30) using either MWA (n=51) or RFA (n=45). The anesthesia induction (22.7 +/- 8.7 min vs. 15.9 +/- 7.2 min, P<0.001), procedure (64.7 +/- 27.5 min vs. 47.3 +/- 15.3 min; P=0.001), and room times (137.7 +/- 33.7 min vs. 103.9 +/- 22.6. min; P<0.001) were significantly longer for CBCT procedures. The procedure time did not differ significantly between MWA and RFA (62.1 +/- 27.4 min vs. 56.1 +/- 23.3 min; P=0.27). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated lower age (P=0.046), CBCT use (P=0.001), RFA use (P=0.02), and non-supine patient position (P=0.01) significantly increased the total procedural cost. After controlling for these variables, the total cost of CBCT ($5981.32 +/- $523.93 vs $5378.93 +/- $453.12; P=0.001) remained higher than CCT and the total cost of RFA ($5981.32 +/- $523.93 vs. $5674.43 +/- $549.14; P=0.05) approached a higher cost than MWA.

CONCLUSION: The use of cone beam CT with overlay fluoroscopic guidance for osteoid osteoma ablation resulted in longer in-room times and greater cost when compared to conventional CT. These cost considerations should be weighed against potential radiation dose advantage of CBCT when choosing an image guidance modality. Younger age, RFA use, and non-supine patient position additionally contributed to higher costs.