Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Controlled Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of the infrared coagulator and the carbon dioxide laser in the removal of decorative tattoos.

A comparative study of the removal of decorative tattoos by the infrared coagulator and the CO2 laser was performed. The comparison was made by following the parameters of length of healing time, postoperative pain, presence of residual pigment, and tendency for scarring. The results showed that the infrared coagulator had the advantages of a more rapid healing time, an easier-to-care-for treatment site, and an equivalent cosmetic result in comparison with the CO2 laser. The CO2 laser had the advantage of total pigment removal in a single treatment, whereas the infrared coagulator often left residual pigment.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app