COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of cryo- and carbon dioxide laser therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Two hundred ninety-four women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia were treated once with either cryotherapy or laser vaporization. Treatment results were controlled for grade, size, and distribution of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia measuring less than 3 cm in diameter without extension into the endocervix had similar low failure rates (4 to 5%), regardless of histologic grade or instrument used. Carbon dioxide laser produced comparatively better results for lesions larger than 3 cm in diameter (92%) and those with up to 5 mm extension into the endocervical canal (89%), compared with 62 and 50%, respectively, with cryotherapy. Complications after cryo- and laser therapy were 0.6 and 7.4%, respectively, and included bleeding and pelvic inflammatory disease. Tailoring treatment modalities according to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia size and location rather than using a single treatment approach provides for the most cost-effective and therapeutically rewarding clinical practice.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app