We have located links that may give you full text access.
Incidence of symptom recurrence after hysterectomy for endometriosis.
Fertility and Sterility 1995 November
OBJECTIVES: To determine the relative risk of symptom recurrence and/or reoperation after hysterectomy with ovarian preservation for the treatment of endometriosis.
DESIGN: Historical prospective study of patients with endometriosis who underwent hysterectomy with or without ovarian preservation.
PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-eight women who underwent hysterectomy with the diagnosis of endometriosis.
METHODS: A computer search identified 138 women who underwent hysterectomy with the diagnosis of endometriosis at Johns Hopkins Hospital from 1979 to 1991. Follow-up information was obtained from medical records, outpatient charts, and telephone surveys.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine women had hysterectomy with some ovarian tissue preserved; 109 had all ovarian tissue removed. Of those with ovarian preservation, 18 of 29 (62%) had recurrent pain and 9 of 29 (31%) required reoperation. Of those who had no ovarian preservation, 11 of 109 (10%) had recurrent symptoms and 4 of 109 (3.7%) required reoperation. Ovarian conservation was associated with a relative risk for pain recurrence of 6.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.5 to 14.6) compared with patients with oophorectomy in a Cox proportional hazards model. The relative risk for reoperation in patients with ovarian conservation was 8.1 (95% CI 2.1 to 31.3).
CONCLUSION: Compared with women who had oophorectomy for endometriosis, patients who underwent hysterectomy with ovarian conservation had 6.1 times greater risk of developing recurrent pain and 8.1 times greater risk of reoperation.
DESIGN: Historical prospective study of patients with endometriosis who underwent hysterectomy with or without ovarian preservation.
PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-eight women who underwent hysterectomy with the diagnosis of endometriosis.
METHODS: A computer search identified 138 women who underwent hysterectomy with the diagnosis of endometriosis at Johns Hopkins Hospital from 1979 to 1991. Follow-up information was obtained from medical records, outpatient charts, and telephone surveys.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine women had hysterectomy with some ovarian tissue preserved; 109 had all ovarian tissue removed. Of those with ovarian preservation, 18 of 29 (62%) had recurrent pain and 9 of 29 (31%) required reoperation. Of those who had no ovarian preservation, 11 of 109 (10%) had recurrent symptoms and 4 of 109 (3.7%) required reoperation. Ovarian conservation was associated with a relative risk for pain recurrence of 6.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.5 to 14.6) compared with patients with oophorectomy in a Cox proportional hazards model. The relative risk for reoperation in patients with ovarian conservation was 8.1 (95% CI 2.1 to 31.3).
CONCLUSION: Compared with women who had oophorectomy for endometriosis, patients who underwent hysterectomy with ovarian conservation had 6.1 times greater risk of developing recurrent pain and 8.1 times greater risk of reoperation.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Acute and non-acute decompensation of liver cirrhosis (47/130).Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver 2024 March 2
Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2024 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society for Microbiology (ASM).Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 March 6
Ten Influential Point-of-Care Ultrasound Papers: 2023 in Review.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 Februrary 20
Administration of methylene blue in septic shock: pros and cons.Critical Care : the Official Journal of the Critical Care Forum 2024 Februrary 17
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app