We have located links that may give you full text access.
Racial differences in the incidence of gout. The role of hypertension.
Arthritis and Rheumatism 1995 May
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence of and examine risk factors for the development of gout in black and white male physicians.
METHODS: Data from 2 cohorts of former medical students, 352 black men in the Meharry Cohort Study and 571 white men in the Johns Hopkins Precursors Study, were analyzed. Cases of gout were identified by self-report. Baseline variables and incident hypertension were examined as risk factors for the development of gout in both cohorts.
RESULTS: The incidence of gout was 3.11 and 1.82 per 1,000 person-years in the black men and the white men, respectively (P < 0.05); the cumulative incidence was 10.9% and 5.8%, respectively (P = 0.04). The relative risk (RR) for gout among the black men was 1.69 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.02-2.80). This excess risk persisted after adjustment for baseline systolic blood pressure (adjusted RR = 1.96 [95% CI 1.14-3.38]). Incident hypertension was independently associated with the development of gout in univariate analysis (RR = 3.78 [95% CI 2.18-6.58]); when this variable was included as a time-dependent covariate in a Cox model, the excess risk for gout in black men was reduced and no longer significant (adjusted RR = 1.30 [95% CI 0.77-2.19]).
CONCLUSION: The approximately 2-fold excess risk for gout among black men is explained, in part, by a greater risk of incident hypertension.
METHODS: Data from 2 cohorts of former medical students, 352 black men in the Meharry Cohort Study and 571 white men in the Johns Hopkins Precursors Study, were analyzed. Cases of gout were identified by self-report. Baseline variables and incident hypertension were examined as risk factors for the development of gout in both cohorts.
RESULTS: The incidence of gout was 3.11 and 1.82 per 1,000 person-years in the black men and the white men, respectively (P < 0.05); the cumulative incidence was 10.9% and 5.8%, respectively (P = 0.04). The relative risk (RR) for gout among the black men was 1.69 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.02-2.80). This excess risk persisted after adjustment for baseline systolic blood pressure (adjusted RR = 1.96 [95% CI 1.14-3.38]). Incident hypertension was independently associated with the development of gout in univariate analysis (RR = 3.78 [95% CI 2.18-6.58]); when this variable was included as a time-dependent covariate in a Cox model, the excess risk for gout in black men was reduced and no longer significant (adjusted RR = 1.30 [95% CI 0.77-2.19]).
CONCLUSION: The approximately 2-fold excess risk for gout among black men is explained, in part, by a greater risk of incident hypertension.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app