We have located links that may give you full text access.
The impact of a policy of amnioinfusion for meconium-stained amniotic fluid.
Obstetrics and Gynecology 1995 Februrary
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of an amnioinfusion (AI) policy for thick or moderate meconium-stained amniotic fluid (AF) on neonatal outcome, specifically meconium-aspiration syndrome and its complications.
METHODS: We reviewed maternal and neonatal charts of 937 vertex, singleton pregnancies complicated by moderate or thick meconium-stained AF during a 3-year period. The patients were divided into groups according to whether AI was performed. Demographic characteristics, risk factors, mode of delivery, pregnancy outcome, and neonatal complications, including meconium-aspiration syndrome, were analyzed.
RESULTS: Four hundred forty patients (47%) received AI (AI group); 497 (53%) did not, for the following reasons: imminent delivery (310 patients), occult meconium (141), or emergency cesarean delivery (46) (no-AI group). Our study did not show any reduction in the incidence of 5-minute Apgar scores of 7 or less (8 versus 7%), meconium below the vocal cords (28 versus 29%), meconium aspiration syndrome (4.5 versus 3.8%), ventilation requirement (4.3 versus 2.4%), or neonatal death (0.7 versus 0.2%) in the AI and no-AI groups, respectively. The AI group had a higher incidence of fetal heart rate abnormalities in labor (48 versus 31%, P < .05), instrumental delivery (15 versus 8%, P < .05), cesarean delivery (28 versus 17%, P < .001), and endometritis (21 versus 13%, P = .004).
CONCLUSIONS: With the policy of routine AI for moderate or thick meconium-stained AF, AI was not clinically feasible in 53% of the cases. We were unable to demonstrate any improvement in neonatal outcome in those who received AI for moderate or thick meconium.
METHODS: We reviewed maternal and neonatal charts of 937 vertex, singleton pregnancies complicated by moderate or thick meconium-stained AF during a 3-year period. The patients were divided into groups according to whether AI was performed. Demographic characteristics, risk factors, mode of delivery, pregnancy outcome, and neonatal complications, including meconium-aspiration syndrome, were analyzed.
RESULTS: Four hundred forty patients (47%) received AI (AI group); 497 (53%) did not, for the following reasons: imminent delivery (310 patients), occult meconium (141), or emergency cesarean delivery (46) (no-AI group). Our study did not show any reduction in the incidence of 5-minute Apgar scores of 7 or less (8 versus 7%), meconium below the vocal cords (28 versus 29%), meconium aspiration syndrome (4.5 versus 3.8%), ventilation requirement (4.3 versus 2.4%), or neonatal death (0.7 versus 0.2%) in the AI and no-AI groups, respectively. The AI group had a higher incidence of fetal heart rate abnormalities in labor (48 versus 31%, P < .05), instrumental delivery (15 versus 8%, P < .05), cesarean delivery (28 versus 17%, P < .001), and endometritis (21 versus 13%, P = .004).
CONCLUSIONS: With the policy of routine AI for moderate or thick meconium-stained AF, AI was not clinically feasible in 53% of the cases. We were unable to demonstrate any improvement in neonatal outcome in those who received AI for moderate or thick meconium.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app