We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Controlled Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of the N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist dextrorphan in patients with acute stroke. Dextrorphan Study Group.
Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation 1995 Februrary
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dextrorphan hydrochloride is a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist that is neuroprotective in experimental models of focal brain ischemia. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum loading dose and maintenance infusion of dextrorphan hydrochloride that are well tolerated in patients with an acute stroke.
METHODS: An intravenous infusion of dextrorphan or placebo was begun within 48 hours of onset of a mild-to-moderate hemispheric stroke. Initially, patients were treated with either placebo (n = 15) or dextrorphan (n = 22) using a 1-hour loading dose (60 to 150 mg) followed by a 23-hour ascending-dose maintenance infusion (maximum total dose, 3310 mg). Subsequently, 29 patients were treated with dextrorphan in an open trial using a 1-hour loading dose (145 to 260 mg) followed by an 11-hour constant rate (30 to 70 mg/h) infusion.
RESULTS: Transient and reversible adverse effects, including nystagmus, nausea, vomiting, somnolence, hallucinations, and agitation, commonly occurred in dextrorphan-treated patients. Loading-dose escalation was stopped because of rapid-onset, reversible, symptomatic hypotension in 7 of 21 patients treated with doses of 200 to 260 mg/h. At the highest rates of maintenance infusion (> 90 mg/h), 3 patients developed deep stupor or apnea. The maximum tolerated loading dose was 180 mg/h, and the maximum tolerated maintenance infusion was 70 mg/h. Maximum plasma levels of 750 to 1000 ng/mL were obtained in 9 patients. There was no difference in neurological outcome at 48 hours between the dextrorphan-treated and placebo-treated patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The highest doses of dextrorphan administered were associated with serious adverse experiences in some patients. Lower doses (loading doses of 145 to 180 mg, maintenance infusions of 50 to 70 mg/h) were better tolerated and rapidly produced potentially neuroprotective plasma concentrations of dextrorphan. These doses were associated with well-defined pharmacological effects compatible with N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonism.
METHODS: An intravenous infusion of dextrorphan or placebo was begun within 48 hours of onset of a mild-to-moderate hemispheric stroke. Initially, patients were treated with either placebo (n = 15) or dextrorphan (n = 22) using a 1-hour loading dose (60 to 150 mg) followed by a 23-hour ascending-dose maintenance infusion (maximum total dose, 3310 mg). Subsequently, 29 patients were treated with dextrorphan in an open trial using a 1-hour loading dose (145 to 260 mg) followed by an 11-hour constant rate (30 to 70 mg/h) infusion.
RESULTS: Transient and reversible adverse effects, including nystagmus, nausea, vomiting, somnolence, hallucinations, and agitation, commonly occurred in dextrorphan-treated patients. Loading-dose escalation was stopped because of rapid-onset, reversible, symptomatic hypotension in 7 of 21 patients treated with doses of 200 to 260 mg/h. At the highest rates of maintenance infusion (> 90 mg/h), 3 patients developed deep stupor or apnea. The maximum tolerated loading dose was 180 mg/h, and the maximum tolerated maintenance infusion was 70 mg/h. Maximum plasma levels of 750 to 1000 ng/mL were obtained in 9 patients. There was no difference in neurological outcome at 48 hours between the dextrorphan-treated and placebo-treated patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The highest doses of dextrorphan administered were associated with serious adverse experiences in some patients. Lower doses (loading doses of 145 to 180 mg, maintenance infusions of 50 to 70 mg/h) were better tolerated and rapidly produced potentially neuroprotective plasma concentrations of dextrorphan. These doses were associated with well-defined pharmacological effects compatible with N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonism.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app