We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
The value of the provocation response in lumbar zygapophyseal joint injections.
Clinical Journal of Pain 1994 December
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between pain provocation and the analgesic response in lumbar zygapophyseal joint blocks.
DESIGN: Consecutive patients undergoing intraarticular zygapophyseal joint blocks for the investigation of low back pain were included in this prospective study.
SETTING: The referred sample was from the metropolitan areas of New Orleans and San Francisco.
PATIENTS: Ninety patients with low back pain of > 3 months' duration and no history of lumbar surgery.
INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent one or more intraarticular injections of radiographic contrast followed by lignocaine (lidocaine) 2% into zygapophyseal joints between L2-3 and L5-S1. Those with definite responses at one or more levels underwent confirmatory blocks using 0.5% bupivacaine.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Provocation of familiar pain and relief of pain after the injection of local anesthetic. Patients were assessed by an independent observer.
RESULTS: A total of 203 joints were studied. Adopting liberal criteria, either exact or similar reproduction of pain on the one hand correlated with either definite or complete relief of pain after a single, analgesic block on the other (p < 0.0001). However, when more stringent criteria were adopted, such as response to a confirmatory block using bupivacaine, there was no significant association.
CONCLUSIONS: This study calls into question the validity of pain provocation alone as a criterion standard in patients undergoing diagnostic lumbar zygapophyseal joint blocks.
DESIGN: Consecutive patients undergoing intraarticular zygapophyseal joint blocks for the investigation of low back pain were included in this prospective study.
SETTING: The referred sample was from the metropolitan areas of New Orleans and San Francisco.
PATIENTS: Ninety patients with low back pain of > 3 months' duration and no history of lumbar surgery.
INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent one or more intraarticular injections of radiographic contrast followed by lignocaine (lidocaine) 2% into zygapophyseal joints between L2-3 and L5-S1. Those with definite responses at one or more levels underwent confirmatory blocks using 0.5% bupivacaine.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Provocation of familiar pain and relief of pain after the injection of local anesthetic. Patients were assessed by an independent observer.
RESULTS: A total of 203 joints were studied. Adopting liberal criteria, either exact or similar reproduction of pain on the one hand correlated with either definite or complete relief of pain after a single, analgesic block on the other (p < 0.0001). However, when more stringent criteria were adopted, such as response to a confirmatory block using bupivacaine, there was no significant association.
CONCLUSIONS: This study calls into question the validity of pain provocation alone as a criterion standard in patients undergoing diagnostic lumbar zygapophyseal joint blocks.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app