We have located links that may give you full text access.
Corneal abrasion associated with contact lens correction of keratoconus--a retrospective study.
Optometry and Vision Science : Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry 1994 November
BACKGROUND: Corneal abrasion is a frequently encountered complication of contact lens wear, but we are not aware of any previous study of relative frequency comparing keratoconic to nonkeratoconic patients.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied the incidence of corneal abrasion during 2 months of contact lens practice.
RESULTS: 784 contact lens-related patient visits (494 total patients); patients were assessed by 3 optometrists and 13 abrasions (11 patients) were diagnosed. Only the total number of individual patients and the first abrasion for each patient were statistically considered; the overall frequency of abrasion was therefore 11/494 (2.3%)/2 months. The frequency of abrasion was 5/68 (7.4%)/2 months for keratoconic patients and 6/426 (1.4%)/2 months for nonkeratoconic patients and this difference was significant (chi 2 test: p < 0.01). Among nonkeratoconic patients, the frequency of abrasion was 2/246 (0.8%)/2 months with hydrogel contact lens wear and 4/178 (2.2%)/2 months with rigid gas permeable (RGP) contact lens wear, but this difference did not achieve significance (chi 2 test: p = 0.10). IDENTIFIED RISK FACTORS INCLUDED: Contact lens wear; a torn lens and chemical keratitis for hydrogel lens wearers; an adherent "bound" lens and keratoconus for rigid lens wearers.
CONCLUSION: Keratoconus appears to be a statistically significant risk factor for corneal abrasion among contact lens wearers.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied the incidence of corneal abrasion during 2 months of contact lens practice.
RESULTS: 784 contact lens-related patient visits (494 total patients); patients were assessed by 3 optometrists and 13 abrasions (11 patients) were diagnosed. Only the total number of individual patients and the first abrasion for each patient were statistically considered; the overall frequency of abrasion was therefore 11/494 (2.3%)/2 months. The frequency of abrasion was 5/68 (7.4%)/2 months for keratoconic patients and 6/426 (1.4%)/2 months for nonkeratoconic patients and this difference was significant (chi 2 test: p < 0.01). Among nonkeratoconic patients, the frequency of abrasion was 2/246 (0.8%)/2 months with hydrogel contact lens wear and 4/178 (2.2%)/2 months with rigid gas permeable (RGP) contact lens wear, but this difference did not achieve significance (chi 2 test: p = 0.10). IDENTIFIED RISK FACTORS INCLUDED: Contact lens wear; a torn lens and chemical keratitis for hydrogel lens wearers; an adherent "bound" lens and keratoconus for rigid lens wearers.
CONCLUSION: Keratoconus appears to be a statistically significant risk factor for corneal abrasion among contact lens wearers.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app