We have located links that may give you full text access.
Rickettsialpox in a New York City hospital, 1980 to 1989.
New England Journal of Medicine 1994 December 16
BACKGROUND: Rickettsialpox is caused by Rickettsia akari, which is transmitted from rodents to humans by bloodsucking mites. The initial skin lesion forms an eschar and is followed by the development of fever, malaise, myalgia, and 5 to 40 maculopapules and papulovesicles. The disease, which responds to tetracycline, can be mistaken for chickenpox. The diagnosis has been based on an increase in serum antibody titers against R. akari over a period of three to eight weeks. We discuss a more rapid technique that uses direct immunofluorescence to identify R. akari in paraffin-embedded tissue, and we describe the histopathological findings of lesional skin.
METHODS: We studied 13 patients (age, 11 months to 58 years) who were seen at Lincoln Hospital in New York City from 1980 to 1989 and were suspected of having rickettsialpox. In nine patients serum samples were obtained during the acute and convalescent phases of the illness for indirect fluorescent-antibody testing. Punch-biopsy specimens of skin lesions were examined by microscopy and by direct fluorescent-antibody testing with an anti-R. rickettsii globulin conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate.
RESULTS: The diagnosis was confirmed in all 13 patients by indirect or direct fluorescent-antibody techniques. Direct fluorescent-antibody testing of eschars from seven patients was positive in five patients, but negative in two patients who had serologically confirmed rickettsialpox. In contrast, direct fluorescent-antibody testing of papulovesicles from nine patients was positive in only one patient. Histopathological analysis of the eschars revealed extensive necrosis and inflammation. In biopsy specimens of papulovesicles, dermal edema, subepidermal vesicles, and vascular changes were present.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of direct fluorescent-antibody testing of an eschar from the presumed site of inoculation and histopathological examination of papulovesicles for distinctive features represents an improved method of diagnosing rickettsialpox.
METHODS: We studied 13 patients (age, 11 months to 58 years) who were seen at Lincoln Hospital in New York City from 1980 to 1989 and were suspected of having rickettsialpox. In nine patients serum samples were obtained during the acute and convalescent phases of the illness for indirect fluorescent-antibody testing. Punch-biopsy specimens of skin lesions were examined by microscopy and by direct fluorescent-antibody testing with an anti-R. rickettsii globulin conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate.
RESULTS: The diagnosis was confirmed in all 13 patients by indirect or direct fluorescent-antibody techniques. Direct fluorescent-antibody testing of eschars from seven patients was positive in five patients, but negative in two patients who had serologically confirmed rickettsialpox. In contrast, direct fluorescent-antibody testing of papulovesicles from nine patients was positive in only one patient. Histopathological analysis of the eschars revealed extensive necrosis and inflammation. In biopsy specimens of papulovesicles, dermal edema, subepidermal vesicles, and vascular changes were present.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of direct fluorescent-antibody testing of an eschar from the presumed site of inoculation and histopathological examination of papulovesicles for distinctive features represents an improved method of diagnosing rickettsialpox.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app