We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Review
An analysis of birth weight by gestational age using a computerized perinatal data base, 1975-1992.
Obstetrics and Gynecology 1994 March
OBJECTIVE: To develop birth weight-for-gestational age nomograms based on a computerized perinatal data base collected prospectively from 1975-1992.
METHODS: Using information from over 60,000 singleton deliveries (January 1975 through October 1992) at the MetroHealth Medical Center in Cleveland, Ohio, standard curves for normal birth weights were computed. Nomograms were developed for the overall population and for subgroups determined by factors known to affect fetal growth, including sex, race, smoking status, and gestational diabetes. The nomograms included the tenth, 50th, and 90th percentiles of birth weights for 24-44 weeks' gestation. Gestational age was based on clinical obstetric estimates confirmed by Dubowitz assessment of the neonate. In addition, third-order regression models were developed to predict median birth weight using gestational age. These models were validated using delivery data for the months of November and December, 1992, which were not included in model development.
RESULTS: The most significant predictors of median birth weight were the first-, second-, and third-order gestational ages, which explained over 80% of the total variation in birth weight. Other significant factors influencing birth weight included infant gender, maternal race, parity, smoking, and diabetes status. Among the marginally significant factors influencing birth weight were pay status and maternal age. In general, before 33 weeks' gestation, there were few differences in the birth weight percentiles of various groups except for those with diabetes; infants of diabetic women exhibited greater birth weights as early as 26 weeks' gestation.
CONCLUSIONS: Considering the large size of the data base and the diverse background of the study population, we believe that these nomograms provide useful norms of birth weight for an indigent urban population. These norms enhance the obstetrician's and neonatologist's ability to identify true cases of retardation or acceleration of intrauterine growth. Simple mathematical models provide easy calculation of the median birth weights for 24-44 weeks while adjusting for many confounding factors.
METHODS: Using information from over 60,000 singleton deliveries (January 1975 through October 1992) at the MetroHealth Medical Center in Cleveland, Ohio, standard curves for normal birth weights were computed. Nomograms were developed for the overall population and for subgroups determined by factors known to affect fetal growth, including sex, race, smoking status, and gestational diabetes. The nomograms included the tenth, 50th, and 90th percentiles of birth weights for 24-44 weeks' gestation. Gestational age was based on clinical obstetric estimates confirmed by Dubowitz assessment of the neonate. In addition, third-order regression models were developed to predict median birth weight using gestational age. These models were validated using delivery data for the months of November and December, 1992, which were not included in model development.
RESULTS: The most significant predictors of median birth weight were the first-, second-, and third-order gestational ages, which explained over 80% of the total variation in birth weight. Other significant factors influencing birth weight included infant gender, maternal race, parity, smoking, and diabetes status. Among the marginally significant factors influencing birth weight were pay status and maternal age. In general, before 33 weeks' gestation, there were few differences in the birth weight percentiles of various groups except for those with diabetes; infants of diabetic women exhibited greater birth weights as early as 26 weeks' gestation.
CONCLUSIONS: Considering the large size of the data base and the diverse background of the study population, we believe that these nomograms provide useful norms of birth weight for an indigent urban population. These norms enhance the obstetrician's and neonatologist's ability to identify true cases of retardation or acceleration of intrauterine growth. Simple mathematical models provide easy calculation of the median birth weights for 24-44 weeks while adjusting for many confounding factors.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app