COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of high-frequency jet to conventional mechanical ventilation in the treatment of severe smoke inhalation injury.

Burns 1994 April
The pathophysiology of smoke inhalation includes surfactant inhibition and pulmonary vascular injury leading to a high permeability pulmonary oedema. It has been shown in surfactant deficient animal models that methods of ventilation (i.e. high-frequency ventilation - HFV) avoiding a large pressure excursion (i.e. pressure change from end expiration to peak inspiration) improves oxygenation and decreases hyaline membrane formation. Therefore, we compared HFV with conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) on lung function in an acute animal model of smoke inhalation (SI). Mongrel dogs were anaesthetized, surgically prepared for haemodynamic and blood gas monitoring, and placed on either CMV (n = 6) or HFV (n = 7). Following baseline (BL) measurements both groups were ventilated with wood smoke for 10 min. Ventilator settings were not adjusted from baseline following smoke inhalation in either groups; positive and expiratory pressure (PEEP, approximately 6 mmHg) was added in both groups following smoke exposure. At the conclusion of the study (4 h postsmoke inhalation) lung samples were taken for surfactant function and lung water measurements. Smoke inhalation immediately increased the A-a gradient (CMV-BL = 6.9 +/- 2.4 to CMV-SI = 77.3 +/- 1.9; HFV-BL = 10.5 +/- 2.7; HFV-SI = 72.8 +/- 3.7 mmHg), venous admixture (CMV-BL = 6.9 +/- 2.8 to CMV-SI 69.8 +/- 6.6; HFV-BL = 7 +/- 1.7 to HFV-SI = 60.4 +/- 7.9 per cent) and decreased Pao2 (CMV-BL = 110 +/- 3.4 to CMV-SI = 28 +/- 3.5; HFV-BL = 103 +/- 3.6 to HFV-SI = 31 +/- 1.7 mmHg) to a similar level in both groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app