We have located links that may give you full text access.
IN VITRO
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Effectiveness of a prolapsed bird's nest filter.
PURPOSE: The authors evaluated the variable deployment of the Bird's Nest filter, including frequency and extent of prolapse in clinical use, and analyzed the effects of this variability on clot-trapping efficiency with an in vitro model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the clinical placement of 20 filters, the average length of cephalic filter wires from the center of the filter was measured from radiographs obtained immediately after placement. To analyze the effects of prolapse, a variable-rate pump was used to mimic the effects of respiration on IVC flow. Four clot sizes (5 x 20, 5 x 40, 10 x 20, and 10 x 40 mm) were evaluated with four filter configurations with wires stretched to different lengths in a cephalic direction from the center of the filter: 2 cm (normal-tight), 5 cm (normal-loose), 8 cm (moderate prolapse), and to a maximum of 12 cm (maximum prolapse). Ten passes for each clot size were performed with each filter configuration in both the horizontal and vertical positions. The smallest clots were also tested with a slower constant-rate pump.
RESULTS: In clinical use, the average length of the filter wire was 5.4 cm (range, 1.2-9.0 cm). With the variable flow pump, the in vitro degree of prolapse did not significantly decrease the trapping efficiency for any but the smallest (5 x 20-mm) clots, for the maximum prolapse configuration in the horizontal position (P = .01). In addition, for these clot sizes, the filter was more efficient with the slower constant rate compared with the faster variable rate; this difference was only statistically significant in the horizontal position for the maximum prolapse configuration (P = .007).
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that in clinical practice, a prolapsed Bird's Nest Filter remains effective for all but small clots.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the clinical placement of 20 filters, the average length of cephalic filter wires from the center of the filter was measured from radiographs obtained immediately after placement. To analyze the effects of prolapse, a variable-rate pump was used to mimic the effects of respiration on IVC flow. Four clot sizes (5 x 20, 5 x 40, 10 x 20, and 10 x 40 mm) were evaluated with four filter configurations with wires stretched to different lengths in a cephalic direction from the center of the filter: 2 cm (normal-tight), 5 cm (normal-loose), 8 cm (moderate prolapse), and to a maximum of 12 cm (maximum prolapse). Ten passes for each clot size were performed with each filter configuration in both the horizontal and vertical positions. The smallest clots were also tested with a slower constant-rate pump.
RESULTS: In clinical use, the average length of the filter wire was 5.4 cm (range, 1.2-9.0 cm). With the variable flow pump, the in vitro degree of prolapse did not significantly decrease the trapping efficiency for any but the smallest (5 x 20-mm) clots, for the maximum prolapse configuration in the horizontal position (P = .01). In addition, for these clot sizes, the filter was more efficient with the slower constant rate compared with the faster variable rate; this difference was only statistically significant in the horizontal position for the maximum prolapse configuration (P = .007).
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that in clinical practice, a prolapsed Bird's Nest Filter remains effective for all but small clots.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app