Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Controlled Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Utility of nocturnal home oximetry for case finding in patients with suspected sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome.

Annals of Internal Medicine 1993 September 16
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prospectively the validity of home oximetry for case finding in patients clinically suspected of having the sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (SAHS).

DESIGN: Blinded comparison of home oximetry and polysomnographic nocturnal recordings.

SETTING: Sleep clinic of a tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS: A total of 240 outpatients referred because of reported sleep disturbances or daytime hypersomnia compatible with the diagnosis of SAHS.

MEASUREMENTS: All participants had nocturnal home oximetry followed by a conventional polysomnographic study. The two recordings were interpreted blindly. Home oximetry test results were classified as abnormal (suspicion of sleep-related breathing abnormalities) in the presence of repetitive, short-duration arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation. (SaO2) fluctuations without any absolute or relative decrease in the SaO2 threshold. The diagnosis of SAHS was confirmed when the apnea-plus-hypopnea index was greater than 10.

RESULTS: Based on the results of the polysomnographic sleep study, 110 patients had SAHS (apnea-plus-hypopnea index, 38.1 +/- 2.5/h; mean +/- SE). Home oximetry test results were interpreted as abnormal in 176 patients (this included 108 patients with SAHS and 68 without SAHS) and were read as normal in 62 patients without SAHS and in 2 with SAHS. Home oximetry testing had a sensitivity of 108/110 or 98.2% (95% Cl, 93.6% to 99.8%); a specificity of 62/130 or 47.7% (Cl, 38.8% to 56.6%); a positive predictive value of 108/176 or 61.4%; and a negative predictive value of 62/64 or 96.9%.

CONCLUSIONS: A negative home oximetry test result is helpful in ruling out the diagnosis of SAHS in patients clinically suspected of having this syndrome, because a negative test result reduced the probability from 54.1% to 3.1% in our patients. However, a positive oximetry test increased the probability from 46% to 61.4% in our group of patients.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app