We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
A reappraisal of cholangiocarcinoma in patient with hepatolithiasis.
Cancer 1993 April 16
BACKGROUND: Hepatolithiasis associated with cholangiocarcinoma is not often encountered. During the past 3 years, an increased incidence of patients with hepatolithiasis associated with cholangiocarcinoma was noted. Data were needed to reliably determine the incidence of this disease.
METHODS: Data concerning the relationship between cholangiocarcinoma and hepatolithiasis are presented. The treatment modalities and factors that influence long-term survival are discussed.
RESULTS: The overall incidence of cholangiocarcinoma in association with hepatolithiasis was 5.0% (55 in 1105). Before 1987, 65% of cholangiocarcinoma in association with hepatolithiasis was diagnosed postoperatively. After 1987, the incidence of accurate preoperative diagnosis increased (22.8%), and in most of the other instances (62.8%), the diagnosis was made at laparotomy. Surgical procedures consisted of common bile duct exploration with T-tube drainage (100%) and hepatectomy (38.2%). Mortality for patients who underwent surgery was 5.4%; they died of recurrent cholangitis. The overall median survival time of patients with cholangiocarcinoma in association with hepatolithiasis was 10.4 months; the 1-, 2-, and 4-year cumulative survival rates were 30.0%, 12.7%, and 3.6%, respectively. Patients with hepatectomy or the presence of mucobilia had better survival rates (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of hepatolithiasis associated with cholangiocarcinoma was 5%. In most patients with cholangiocarcinoma in association with hepatolithiasis, diagnosis can be made preoperatively and at laparotomy. Patients with hepatectomy or presence of mucobilia had better survival rates.
METHODS: Data concerning the relationship between cholangiocarcinoma and hepatolithiasis are presented. The treatment modalities and factors that influence long-term survival are discussed.
RESULTS: The overall incidence of cholangiocarcinoma in association with hepatolithiasis was 5.0% (55 in 1105). Before 1987, 65% of cholangiocarcinoma in association with hepatolithiasis was diagnosed postoperatively. After 1987, the incidence of accurate preoperative diagnosis increased (22.8%), and in most of the other instances (62.8%), the diagnosis was made at laparotomy. Surgical procedures consisted of common bile duct exploration with T-tube drainage (100%) and hepatectomy (38.2%). Mortality for patients who underwent surgery was 5.4%; they died of recurrent cholangitis. The overall median survival time of patients with cholangiocarcinoma in association with hepatolithiasis was 10.4 months; the 1-, 2-, and 4-year cumulative survival rates were 30.0%, 12.7%, and 3.6%, respectively. Patients with hepatectomy or the presence of mucobilia had better survival rates (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of hepatolithiasis associated with cholangiocarcinoma was 5%. In most patients with cholangiocarcinoma in association with hepatolithiasis, diagnosis can be made preoperatively and at laparotomy. Patients with hepatectomy or presence of mucobilia had better survival rates.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app