We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Descending thoracic aorta-to-femoral artery bypass: ten years' experience with a durable procedure.
Journal of Vascular Surgery 1993 Februrary
PURPOSE: Arterial bypass from the descending thoracic aorta to the femoral system provides successful perfusion when an approach to the abdominal aorta is undesirable. This review of a large series with a decade of experience was conducted to better define patency data and the natural history of patients after this operation.
METHODS: During a 10-year period, 21 patients, 18 men and 3 women (mean age 57 years), underwent descending thoracic aorta to left femoral artery bypass with femorofemoral bypass. These were placed to convert axillopopliteal or axillofemoral grafts (12 patients) to a more permanent inflow source. The axillary bypasses had been previously placed to allow removal of infected aortic grafts and had undergone a total of 14 revisions or thrombectomies before conversion. In addition, patients had this procedure after multiple failed attempts (at least two) at intraabdominal aortic repair (five patients) or to avoid exploration of the abdomen after extensive retroperitoneal dissection or radiation (four patients). Surgical technique involved a seventh interspace thoracotomy with a transdiaphragmatic retroperitoneal anterior axillary line tunnel to the left groin.
RESULTS: There was no perioperative mortality. The mean hospital visit was 15.1 days and intensive care stay 4.3 days. There was no perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, or renal failure that necessitated dialysis. With a follow-up period of 1 to 121 months (mean 44), the 4-year patency rate was 100%. A single graft failed at 49 months but was renewed by thrombectomy and femorofemoral bypass. Thus the extended patency rate was 86%, but the secondary patency rate remained 100% throughout. Since the thoracic operations, patients have required five femoropopliteal, three femorotibial, two profunda, and two femorofemoral operations.
CONCLUSIONS: Descending thoracic aorta-to-femoral artery grafting is a safe, extremely durable arterial bypass configuration. It is an excellent reconstruction for survivors of aortic graft infection, those who have had multiple failures of aortic grafts, and patients for whom abdominal exploration would be hazardous.
METHODS: During a 10-year period, 21 patients, 18 men and 3 women (mean age 57 years), underwent descending thoracic aorta to left femoral artery bypass with femorofemoral bypass. These were placed to convert axillopopliteal or axillofemoral grafts (12 patients) to a more permanent inflow source. The axillary bypasses had been previously placed to allow removal of infected aortic grafts and had undergone a total of 14 revisions or thrombectomies before conversion. In addition, patients had this procedure after multiple failed attempts (at least two) at intraabdominal aortic repair (five patients) or to avoid exploration of the abdomen after extensive retroperitoneal dissection or radiation (four patients). Surgical technique involved a seventh interspace thoracotomy with a transdiaphragmatic retroperitoneal anterior axillary line tunnel to the left groin.
RESULTS: There was no perioperative mortality. The mean hospital visit was 15.1 days and intensive care stay 4.3 days. There was no perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, or renal failure that necessitated dialysis. With a follow-up period of 1 to 121 months (mean 44), the 4-year patency rate was 100%. A single graft failed at 49 months but was renewed by thrombectomy and femorofemoral bypass. Thus the extended patency rate was 86%, but the secondary patency rate remained 100% throughout. Since the thoracic operations, patients have required five femoropopliteal, three femorotibial, two profunda, and two femorofemoral operations.
CONCLUSIONS: Descending thoracic aorta-to-femoral artery grafting is a safe, extremely durable arterial bypass configuration. It is an excellent reconstruction for survivors of aortic graft infection, those who have had multiple failures of aortic grafts, and patients for whom abdominal exploration would be hazardous.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app